Show simple item record

dc.contributorOgutu, Joseph O.en_US
dc.contributorSaid, Mohammeden_US
dc.contributorKrol, Maarten S.en_US
dc.contributorde Leeuw, Janen_US
dc.contributorHoekstra, Arjen Y.en_US
dc.creatorBosire, Caroline K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-29T14:12:55Z
dc.date.available2016-03-29T14:12:55Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880915000705en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/3Ew7MDc9en_US
dc.identifier.citationCaroline K. Bosire, Joseph O. Ogutu, Mohammed Said, Maarten S. Krol, Jan de Leeuw, Arjen Y. Hoekstra. (1/7/2015). Trends and spatial variation in water and land footprints of meat and milk production systems in Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (205), pp. 36-47.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/4599
dc.description.abstractGlobal consumption of livestock products is increasing steadily due to human population growth, poverty reduction and dietary changes raising the demand for already scarce freshwater and land resources. Here, we analyze the changes associated with direct and indirect use of freshwater and land for meat and milk production in three production systems in Kenya between the 1980s and 2000s. We use two resource use indicators, the water footprint (m3/year) and land footprint (ha), to assess changes in freshwater and land use for cattle, goats, sheep and camels in arid, semi-arid and humid production systems. We estimate actual water and land use using Kenya-wide data for yields, feed composition and feed conversion efficiencies. Our results show that the amounts of freshwater and land resources used for production are determined mainly by production volumes and feed conversion efficiencies. Total water and land footprints of milk production increased for goats, sheep and camels but decreased by half for cattle in arid and semi-arid production systems, in correspondence with similar changes in the total numbers of each livestock species. Green water and grazing land footprints dominated in all production systems due to the predominance of indirect use of water to support forage production. The per unit meat footprint for cattle increased significantly between the 1980s and 2000s in all production systems, due to adverse trends in feed conversion efficiency, while changes in the water and land footprints of other animal products were small, due to modest changes in all influencing factors. In contrast, national average footprints per unit of beef and milk show a modest decrease due to a relative shift of production to the more resource-efficient humid production system. Given the potential increase in demand for livestock products and limited freshwater and land availability, feed conversion efficiencies should be improved by rehabilitating degraded rangelands, adopting improved breeds and using appropriate feed composition.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment;(2015) Pagination 36-47en_US
dc.subjectland footprinten_US
dc.subjectmeat and milken_US
dc.titleTrends and spatial variation in water and land footprints of meat and milk production systems in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-07-01en_US
dcterms.extent36-47en_US
cg.creator.idOgutu, Joseph O.: 0000-0002-7379-0387en_US
cg.creator.idSaid, Mohammed: 0000-0001-8127-6399en_US
cg.creator.idde Leeuw, Jan: 0000-0002-2005-4351en_US
cg.subject.agrovocenvironmenten_US
cg.subject.agrovoclanden_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivestocken_US
cg.subject.agrovocproductionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwateren_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivestock productionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater footprinten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerWorld Agroforestry Center - ICRAFen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Twente - UT Netherlandsen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Hohenheim - UHOHen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteWorld Agroforestry Center - ICRAFen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2016-03-31en_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKEen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.859en_US
cg.journalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmenten_US
cg.issue205en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV