Show simple item record

dc.contributorAbaidoo, Roberten_US
dc.contributorFatondji, Dougbedjien_US
dc.contributorOpoku, Andrewen_US
dc.creatorIbrahim, Alien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-08T23:07:01Z
dc.date.available2017-02-08T23:07:01Z
dc.identifierhttp://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/9840en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/2Obk0G4nen_US
dc.identifier.citationAli Ibrahim, Robert Abaidoo, Dougbedji Fatondji, Andrew Opoku. (22/5/2016). Fertilizer micro-dosing increases crop yield in the Sahelian low-input cropping system: A success with a shadow. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 62(3), pp. 277-288.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5595
dc.description.abstractOver the years, a scarcity of information on nutrient gains or losses has led to overemphasis being placed on crop yields and economic income as the direct benefits from fertilizer micro-dosing technology. There is increasing concern about the sustainability of this technology in smallholder Sahelian cropping systems. This study was designed in the 2013 and 2014 cropping seasons to establish nutrient balances under fertilizer micro-dosing technology and their implications on soil nutrient stocks. Two fertilizer micro-dosing treatments [2 g hill−1 of diammonium phosphate (DAP) and 6 g hill−1 of compound fertilizer Nitrogen-Phosphorus-Potassium (NPK) (15-15-15)] and three rates of manure (100 g hill−1, 200 g hill−1 and 300 g hill−1) and the relevant control treatments were arranged in a factorial experiment organized in a randomized complete block design with three replications. On average, millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) grain yield increased by 39 and 72% for the plots that received the fertilizer micro-dosing of 6 g NPK hill−1 and 2 g DAP hill−1, respectively, in comparison with the unfertilized control plots. The average partial nutrients balances for the two cropping seasons were −37 kg N ha−1yr−1, −1 kg P ha−1yr−1 and −34 kg K ha−1yr−1 in plots that received the application of 2 g DAP hill−1, and −31 kg N ha−1yr−1, −1 kg P ha−1yr−1 and −27 kg K ha−1yr−1 for 6 g NPK hill−1. The transfer of straw yields accounted for 66% N, 55% P and 89% K for removal. The average full nutrient balances for the two cropping seasons in fertilizer microdosing treatments were −47.8 kg N ha−1 yr−1, −6.8 kg P ha−1 yr−1 and −21.3 kg K ha−1 yr−1 which represent 7.8, 24.1 and 9.4% of N, P and K stocks, respectively. The nutrient stock to balance ratio (NSB) for N decreased from 13 to 11 and from 15 to 12 for the plots that received the application of 2 g DAP hill−1 and 6 g NPK hill−1, respectively. The average NSB for P did not exceed 5 for the same plots. It was concluded that fertilizer micro-dosing increases the risk of soil nutrient depletion in the Sahelian low-input cropping system. These results have important implications for developing an agro-ecological approach to addressing sustainable food production in the Sahelian smallholder cropping systemen_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Openen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceSoil Science and Plant Nutrition;62,(2016) Pagination 277,288en_US
dc.subjectnutrient balancesen_US
dc.subjectfertilizer micro-dosingen_US
dc.subjectnutrient stocksen_US
dc.titleFertilizer micro-dosing increases crop yield in the Sahelian low-input cropping system: A success with a shadowen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2016-05-22en_US
dcterms.extent277-288en_US
cg.creator.idAbaidoo, Robert: 0000-0002-1235-2252en_US
cg.subject.agrovocsustainabilityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpearl milleten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology - KNUSTen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2017-03-31en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryNGen_US
cg.contactibramali@myway.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1194169en_US
cg.isijournalISI journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor0.954en_US
cg.issn0038-0768en_US
cg.journalSoil Science and Plant Nutritionen_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.volume62en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV