Show simple item record

dc.contributorRekik, Mouraden_US
dc.contributorBen Salem, Imeneen_US
dc.contributorMleil, Samiaen_US
dc.contributorRouatbi, Mariemen_US
dc.creatorLassoued, Narjessen_US
dc.date2016-01-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T13:31:00Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T13:31:00Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijb/article/view/56045en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/288886586_Strategic_Feeding_Alternating_a_2-months'_Feeding_Restriction_and_a_Short_Boost_of_the_Feeding_Level_Increases_Conception_Rate_in_Sheepen_US
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijb.v8n1p80en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/8MNnSiR2en_US
dc.identifier.citationNarjess Lassoued, Mourad Rekik, Imene Ben Salem, Samia Mleil, Mariem Rouatbi. (1/1/2016). Strategic Feeding Alternating a 2-months’ Feeding Restriction and a Short Boost of the Feeding Level Increases Conception Rate in Sheep. International Journal of Biology, 8(1).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/6044
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate if feeding patterns prior to and after artificial insemination (AI) affect the reproductive performances of ewes. Two breeds were used; the Barbarine (n = 133) and Queue Fine de l’Ouest (QFO; n = 129). For each breed, 2 experimental groups balanced for age and live weight were formed. For 75 days before AI, ewes in treatment High daily grazed for 6 hours and were supplemented with 0.6 kg of concentrate. For those in treatment Low-High, grazing was restricted to 3 hours only. From 21 days before insemination and the following 20 days, feeding pattern for Low-High ewes was switched to the High feeding regime. Changes in live weight and ovarian activity were monitored; conception rate and litter size were recorded. At the end of the restriction period and for both breeds, Low-High ewes reached lower live weights than High ewes (p < 0.05). Prior to AI and for both breeds, Low-High ewes weighed less than those in the High treatment group but no statistical differences were observed. At the end of the restriction period, more QFO ewes were cycling than for the Barbarine breed (75/129 vs. 55/133; p < 0.01). Further, less QFO ewes in the Low-High treatment were cycling than High ewes (30/65 vs. 45/64; p < 0.01). More QFO ewes conceived to AI than Barbarine counterparts (77/112 vs. 73/130; p < 0.05). For both breeds, higher proportions of ewes in the Low-High treatment groups conceived to AI but differences reached statistical significance only for Barbarine breed. Following a food-restriction period between weaning and mating, improved conception rates are achieved if the plane of nutrition is increased few weeks prior to and after AI in comparison to a continuous increase in live weight during the same period.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Center of Science and Educationen_US
dc.rightsBYen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Biology;8,(2015)en_US
dc.subjectfeed restrictionen_US
dc.subjectconception rateen_US
dc.titleStrategic Feeding Alternating a 2-months’ Feeding Restriction and a Short Boost of the Feeding Level Increases Conception Rate in Sheepen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.ID0000-0001-7455-2017en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsheepen_US
cg.subject.agrovocreproductionen_US
cg.contributor.centerInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie; National Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia - INRATen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational School Medicine Veterinary; École Nationale de Médecine Vétérinaire de Sidi Thabeten_US
cg.contributor.centerManouba University, Tunisiaen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Strategic Results Framework Related - SRFen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryTNen_US
cg.contactm.rekik@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/codisen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
@mire NV