Show simple item record

dc.creatorLe, Quang Baoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-28T21:38:45Z
dc.date.available2017-02-28T21:38:45Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/f4JB9CPUen_US
dc.identifier.citationQuang Bao Le. (18/12/2016). Methodological Abilities of Integrated Models to Support Agricultural Landscape Resilience: Current Status and Research Perspectives. Toulouse, France: Sabine Sauvage (Curator), José Miguel Sanchez Perez, Andrea Emilio Rizzoli.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/6093
dc.description.abstractIt is important to increase the resilience of rural landscapes in the face of global changes. It is widely recognized that integrated modeling is often a methodological choice to study landscape resilience because the task is often beyond the ability of direct, empirical studies. However, so far there has not yet been a systemized, critical review on methodological abilities current modeling approaches can have for supporting management for agricultural landscape resilience. This review study (i) highlighted the methodological abilities of integrated system modeling ideally needed for agricultural landscape management for resilience, (ii) reviewed strengths and weakness of common integrated modeling methods with respects to these required methodological abilities, and (iii) discussed perspectives of modeling research toward meeting these abilities. Based on common frameworks of socio-ecological systems, we identified nine methodological abilities that would be ideally needed for integrated modeling for supporting agricultural landscape resilience: (1) representing social-ecological complementariness, (2) anticipating multiple performances in a distributed way, (3) explaining behavioral change of multiple human actors, (4) representing flexible, multi-scale feedbacks, (5) capturing intra- and inter-farm heterogeneity, (6) explaining farm's structural changes, (7) being sensitive to key drivers, (8) managing uncertainty, and (9) mediating effective participation. Seven common integrated modeling approaches selected for our review are: (a) material flow analysis, (b) system dynamics, (c) Bayesian network, (d) bio-economic optimization, (e) coupled components, (f) cellular automata, and (g) multi-agent systems (agent-based model). The results are the matrices of concise narrative assessments with references to published examples, rather than abstract scores, of each modeling approach against the nine methodological criteria. The matrices can serve as methodological maps that help citizen scientists, with own context, to position themselves and wherefrom identify relevant modeling directions towards meeting the required methodological criteria better. We demonstrated the potential usage of the reviewed matrices with different typical use cases.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Environmental Modelling and Software Society - iEMSsen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.subjectintegrated modelingen_US
dc.subjectmethodological abilitiesen_US
dc.subjectreviewen_US
dc.subjectsocioecological resilienceen_US
dc.titleMethodological Abilities of Integrated Models to Support Agricultural Landscape Resilience: Current Status and Research Perspectivesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dcterms.available2016-12-18en_US
dcterms.issued2016-12-18en_US
cg.creator.idLe, Quang Bao: 0000-0001-8514-1088en_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfarming systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocresilienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsustainabilityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultural landscapeen_US
cg.contributor.centerCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR System Organization - CGIARen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contactQ.Le@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV