Show simple item record

dc.contributorAdinoyi, Aliyuen_US
dc.creatorAttanda, M.L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-08T22:15:47Z
dc.date.available2017-04-08T22:15:47Z
dc.identifierhttp://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/9450; http://www.ijettjournal.org/en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/srh0Rmg6en_US
dc.identifier.citationM. L. Attanda, Aliyu Adinoyi. (29/2/2016). Effect of Variety, Soil Moisture Content and Cutting Depth on Performance of a Single Row Animal Drawn Groundnut Digger. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), 32 (6), pp. 281-287.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/6661
dc.description.abstractThe challenge of providing a more efficient and cost-effective ways of harvesting groundnut amongst the small holder farmers is imperative in northern Nigeria as a result of intensity of labor requirement in the task. It is reported that up to 40 % of the total labor required to grow groundnut is expanded on harvesting operation and at peak harvest periods, labor shortages often occur leading to higher costs of production and subsequent years of reduction in yield due to soil nutrient loss owing to the uprooting method of manure harvesting. In order to assuage some of these challenges, a field test was conducted to evaluate operation performance of a single row animal drawn groundnut harvester developed in the department of Agricultural engineering Bayero University Kano. The effects of the control parameters of; variety of the groundnut seed planted, soil moisture content and cutting depth of the digger were studied on the performance parameters of the harvester as; digging efficiency, percentages of exposed pods loss, unexposed pods loss, undug pods loss and total of pods loss. The results obtained revealed a highly significant difference among the varieties with respect to unexposed pod loss (%), while moisture content was found to significantly affect exposed pods loss (%), total pos loss and digging efficiency. Varying the cutting depth significantly affected exposed pods (%), un-exposed pods (%), total pod loss and digging efficiency. Interaction between SAMNUT 23, moisture content of 12.4%db and cutting depth of 15 cm had digging efficiency of 97.22%, while the interactions between SAMNUT 26, moisture content of 12.4%db and cutting depth of 15 cm had digging efficiency of 95.14%. The study revealed that higher digging efficiency is obtainable with higher soil moisture content and cutting depth, irrespective of the variety under cultivation, while correlation analysis revealed that digging efficiency and total percentage of pod loss are inversely related, signifying that at lower digging efficiency there would be higher pod loss and vice versa.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSeventh Sense Research Group- SSRGen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT);32,(2016) Pagination 281,287en_US
dc.subjectcutting depthen_US
dc.titleEffect of Variety, Soil Moisture Content and Cutting Depth on Performance of a Single Row Animal Drawn Groundnut Diggeren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2016-02-29en_US
dcterms.extent281-287en_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocefficiencyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmoisture contenten_US
cg.contributor.centerBayero University, Centre for Dryland Agriculture - BUK-CDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes - GLen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
cg.contactA.Adinoyi@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.issn2231-5381en_US
cg.journalInternational Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)en_US
cg.issue6en_US
cg.volume32en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV