Show simple item record

dc.contributorKabalan, Rabihen_US
dc.contributorBraidy, Joelleen_US
dc.contributorRouphael, Youssefen_US
dc.contributorOweis, Theiben_US
dc.creatorKaram, Fadien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-23T21:24:55Z
dc.date.available2017-07-23T21:24:55Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377408002394en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/222885077_Yield_and_water-production_functions_of_two_durum_wheat_cultivars_grown_under_different_irrigation_and_nitrogen_regimesen_US
dc.identifier.citationFadi Karam, Rabih Kabalan, Joelle Braidy, Youssef Rouphael, Theib Oweis. (1/4/2009). Yield and water-production functions of two durum wheat cultivars grown under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes. Agricultural Water Management, 96 (4), pp. 603-615.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7160
dc.description.abstractWheat (TriticumdurumL.) yields inthe semi-aridregions are limitedby inadequatewater supply late in the cropping season. Planning suitable irrigation strategy and nitrogen fertilizationwith the appropriate crop phenology will produce optimumgrain yields. A 3-year experiment was conducted on deep, fairly drained clay soil, at Tal Amara Research Station in the central Bekaa Valley of Lebanon to investigate the response of durumwheat to supplemental irrigation (IRR) and nitrogen rate (NR). Threewater supply levels (rainfed and two treatments irrigated at half and full soil water deficit) were coupled with three N fertilization rates (100, 150 and 200 kg N ha 1) and two cultivars (Waha and Haurani) under the same cropping practices (sowing date, seeding rate, row space and seeding depth). Averaged across N treatments and years, rainfed treatment yielded 3.49Mg ha 1 and it was 25% and 28% less than half and full irrigation treatments, respectively, forWaha,while for Haurani the rainfed treatment yielded 3.21Mg ha 1, and it was 18%and 22%less than half and full irrigation, respectively.On theotherhand,Nfertilizationof150and200 kg N ha 1 increasedgrainyieldinWahaby12%and 16%,respectively, incomparisonwithNfertilizationof100 kg N ha 1,whileforcultivarHaurani the increases were 24% and 38%, respectively. Regardless of cultivar, results showed that supplemental irrigation significantly increased grain number per square meter and grain weight with respect to the rainfed treatment,while nitrogen fertilizationwas observed to have significant effects only ongrain number per squaremeter.Moreover, results showedthat grain yield for cultivar Haurani was less affected by supplemental irrigation and more affected by nitrogen fertilization than cultivarWaha in all years. However, cultivar effects were of lower magnitude compared with those of irrigation and nitrogen.We conclude that optimum yield wasproducedforbothcultivarsat50%ofsoilwaterdeficitas supplemental irrigationandNrate of 150 kg N ha 1. However, Harvest index (HI) and water use efficiency (WUE) in both cultivars were not significantly affected neither by supplemental irrigation nor by nitrogen rate. Evapotranspiration (ET) of rainfed wheat ranged from 300 to 400mm, while irrigated wheat had seasonal ETranging from450 to 650mm.Onthe other hand, irrigationtreatments significantly affected ET after normalizing for vapor pressure deficit (ET/VPD) during the growing season. Supplemental irrigation at 50% and 100% of soil water deficit had approximately 26 and 52mmmbar 1 more ET/VPD, respectively, than those grown under rainfed conditions.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management;96,(2008) Pagination 603-615en_US
dc.subjectvapor pressure deficit (vpd)en_US
dc.subjectirrigation strategyen_US
dc.subjectnitrogen rateen_US
dc.subjecttriticum durum l.en_US
dc.titleYield and water-production functions of two durum wheat cultivars grown under different irrigation and nitrogen regimesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2008-11-05en_US
dcterms.extent603-615en_US
dcterms.issued2009-04-01en_US
cg.creator.idOweis, Theib: 0000-0002-2003-4852en_US
cg.subject.agrovocsupplemental irrigationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater-use efficiencyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwheaten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerLebanese Agricultural Research Institute - LARIen_US
cg.contributor.centerLebanese University - UL Lebanonen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe Litani River Authorityen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2108-11-05en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryLBen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contactFadi_Karam@dai.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.018en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.848en_US
cg.issn0378-3774en_US
cg.journalAgricultural Water Managementen_US
cg.issue4en_US
cg.volume96en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV