Show simple item record

dc.contributorSirari, Asmitaen_US
dc.contributorKumar, Dineshen_US
dc.contributorSandhu, Jeet Singhen_US
dc.contributorSingh, Sarvjeeten_US
dc.contributorKapoor, Karanen_US
dc.contributorSingh, Inderjiten_US
dc.contributorGowda, CL Laxmipathien_US
dc.contributorPande, Sureshen_US
dc.contributorGaur, Pooranen_US
dc.contributorMamta, Sharmaen_US
dc.contributorImtiaz, Muhammaden_US
dc.contributorSiddique, Kadambot H Men_US
dc.creatorKaur, Livinderen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-23T23:28:01Z
dc.date.available2017-07-23T23:28:01Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/11651en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/Uh0pEEk6en_US
dc.identifier.citationLivinder Kaur, Asmita Sirari, Dinesh Kumar, Jeet Singh Sandhu, Sarvjeet Singh, Karan Kapoor, Inderjit Singh, CL Laxmipathi Gowda, Suresh Pande, Pooran Gaur, Sharma Mamta, Muhammad Imtiaz, Kadambot H M Siddique. (25/11/2013). Combining Ascochyta blight and Botrytis grey mould resistance in chickpea through interspecific hybridization. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 52 (1), pp. 157-163.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7236
dc.description.abstractAscochyta blight (AB) caused by Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr. and Botrytis grey mould (BGM) caused by Botrytis cinerea (Pers. ex Fr.) are important diseases of the aerial plant parts of chickpea in most chickpea growing areas of the world. Although conventional approaches have contributed to reducing disease, the use of new technologies is expected to further reduce losses through these biotic stresses. Reliable screening techniques were developed: ‘field screening technique’ for adult plant screening, ‘cloth chamber technique’ and ‘growth chamber technique’ for the study of races of the pathogen and for segregating generations. Furthermore, the ‘cut twig technique’ for interspecific population for AB and BGM resistance was developed. For introgression of high levels of AB and BGM resistance in cultivated chickpea from wild relatives, accessions of seven annual wild Cicer spp. were evaluated and identified: C. judaicum accessions 185, ILWC 95 and ILWC 61, C. pinnatifidum accessions 188, 199 and ILWC 212 as potential donors. C. pinnatifidum accession188 was crossed with ICCV 96030 and 62 F9 lines resistant to AB and BGM were derived. Of the derived lines, several are being evaluated for agronomic traits and yield parameters while four lines, GL 29029, GL29206, GL29212, GL29081 possessing high degree of resistance were crossed with susceptible high yielding cultivars BG 256 to improve resistance and to undertake molecular studies. Genotyping of F2 populations with SSR markers from the chickpea genome was done to identify markers potentially linked with AB and BGM resistance genes. In preliminary studies, of 120 SSR markers used, six (Ta 2, Ta 110, Ta 139, CaSTMS 7, CaSTMS 24 and Tr 29) were identified with polymorphic bands between resistant derivative lines and the susceptible parent. The study shows that wild species of Cicer are the valuable gene pools of resistance to AB and BGM. The resistant derivative lines generated here can serve as good pre-breeding material and markers identified can assist in marker assisted selection for resistance breedingen_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherFirenze University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourcePhytopathologia Mediterranea;52,(2013) Pagination 157-163en_US
dc.subjectssr markersen_US
dc.subjectresistanceen_US
dc.titleCombining Ascochyta blight and Botrytis grey mould resistance in chickpea through interspecific hybridizationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2013-11-25en_US
dcterms.extent157-163en_US
cg.creator.idMamta, Sharma: 0000-0001-5745-4693en_US
cg.subject.agrovoccicer arietinumen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccicer pinnatifidumen_US
cg.subject.agrovocinterspecific hybridizationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocChickpeaen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerIndian Council of Agricultural Research - ICARen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe University of Western Australia - UWAen_US
cg.contributor.centerPunjab Agricultural University - PAUen_US
cg.contributor.centerDirectorate of Wheat Research - DWRen_US
cg.contributor.centerGlobal Research-for-development Support Ventures - GRSVen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
cg.contactlivinderk@rediffmail.comen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.255en_US
cg.issn0031-9465en_US
cg.journalPhytopathologia Mediterraneaen_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.volume52en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV