Show simple item record

dc.contributorN’Diaye, Amidouen_US
dc.contributorClarke, Franen_US
dc.contributorClarke, Johnen_US
dc.contributorKnox, Ronen_US
dc.contributorRutkoski, Jessicaen_US
dc.contributorBassi, Filippoen_US
dc.contributorPozniak, Curtisen_US
dc.creatorHaile, Jemaneshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T20:13:16Z
dc.date.available2019-01-21T20:13:16Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11032-018-0818-xen_US
dc.identifier.citationJemanesh Haile, Amidou N’Diaye, Fran Clarke, John Clarke, Ron Knox, Jessica Rutkoski, Filippo Bassi, Curtis Pozniak. (30/6/2018). Genomic selection for grain yield and quality traits in durum wheat. Molecular Breeding, 38: 75, pp. 1-18.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9292
dc.description.abstractThe prediction accuracies of genomic selection depend on several factors, including the genetic architecture of target traits, the number of traits considered at a given time, and the statistical models. Here, we assessed the potential of single-trait (ST) and multi-trait (MT) genomic prediction models for durum wheat on yield and quality traits using a breeding panel (BP) of 170 varieties and advanced breeding lines, and a doubled-haploid (DH) population of 154 lines. The two populations were genotyped with the Infinium iSelect 90K SNP assay and phenotyped for various traits. Six ST-GS models (RRBLUP, G-BLUP, BayesA, BayesB, Bayesian LASSO, and RKHS) and three MT prediction approaches (MTBayesA, MT-Matrix, and MT-SI approaches which use economic selection index as a trait value) were applied for predicting yield, protein content, gluten index, and alveograph measures. The ST prediction accuracies ranged from 0.5 to 0.8 for the various traits and models and revealed comparable prediction accuracies for most of the traits in both populations, except BayesA and BayesB, which better predicted gluten index, tenacity, and strength in the DH population. The MT-GS models were more accurate than the ST-GS models only for grain yield in the BP. Using BP as a training set to predict the DH population resulted in poor predictions. Overall, all the six ST-GS models appear to be applicable for GS of yield and gluten strength traits in durum wheat, but we recommend the simple computational models RR-BLUP or GBLUP for predicating single trait and MT-SI for predicting yield and protein simultaneously.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature) (Springer Open Choice Hybrid Journals)en_US
dc.sourceMolecular Breeding;38:75,(2018) Pagination 1-18en_US
dc.subjectquality traitsen_US
dc.subjectgs modelsen_US
dc.subjectmulti-traiten_US
dc.subjecttriticum turgidum l. var. durumen_US
dc.titleGenomic selection for grain yield and quality traits in durum wheaten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2018-05-26en_US
dcterms.extent1-18en_US
dcterms.issued2018-06-30en_US
cg.creator.idBassi, Filippo: 0000-0002-1164-5598en_US
cg.subject.agrovocgenomic selectionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocselection indexen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Rice Research Institute - IRRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Saskatchewan - USASKen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Saskatchewan, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, Crop Development Centre - USAK - AGBIO- CDCen_US
cg.contributor.centerAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current Research and Development Center - AAFC - .Swift.CurrentRDCen_US
cg.contributor.centerWestern Grains Research Foundation - WGRFen_US
cg.contributor.centerNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council - NSERC - CRSNGen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada - AAFCen_US
cg.contributor.funderGenome Canadaen_US
cg.contributor.funderGenome Canada, Genome Prairieen_US
cg.contributor.projectCRP WHEAT Phase IIen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.contactjemanesh.haile@usask.caen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11032-018-0818-xen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.077en_US
cg.issn1380-3743en_US
cg.journalMolecular Breedingen_US
cg.volume38:75en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV