Show simple item record

dc.contributorCraufurd, Peteren_US
dc.contributorHaileslassie, Amareen_US
dc.contributorRamilan, Thiagarajahen_US
dc.contributorRathore, Abhisheken_US
dc.contributorWhitbread, Anthonyen_US
dc.creatorShalander, Kumaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T05:22:41Z
dc.date.available2020-02-11T05:22:41Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationKumar Shalander, Peter Craufurd, Amare Haileslassie, Thiagarajah Ramilan, Abhishek Rathore, Anthony Whitbread. (1/11/2019). Farm typology analysis and technology assessment: An application in an arid region of South Asia. (88), pp. 1-14.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/10705
dc.description.abstractThe design and diffusion of context-specific technologies is centrally important in the multi-dimensional, complex farming systems in arid and semi-arid regions. This paper uses a mixed-method framework to characterize the complexity and heterogeneity of smallholder farming systems and identifies constraints to and opportunities for sustainable intensification. Specifically, the study: (i) characterized farm household typologies based on the diversity of livelihood assets; (ii) co-designed context- specific interventions through an iterative participatory process; and (iii) ex-ante evaluated such interventions to inform multiple stakeholders. We explored farming system diversity using data from 224 farm households in western Rajasthan, India. Employing multivariate statistical techniques and participatory validation, we identified 7 distinct farm household types. Participatory appraisal with multiple stakeholders revealed heterogeneity across farm household types. For instance, the interest of farmers in integrating perennial fruit trees even among the rainfed farm household types markedly varied: household type 1 preferred the multipurpose forestry tree, khejri which requires low labor inputs; household type 2 preferred market-oriented horticulture production; household type 3 did not opt for perennials but for small ruminants; and household type 4 (dominated by women) opted for small horticulture kitchen gardens. The study demonstrated the utility of a mixed-methods approach that addresses multi-dimensional heterogeneity to generate insights and assist in co-designing locally appropriate technologies across different farm types and agro-ecological regions to achieve sustainable intensification.en_US
dc.formatTXTen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier (12 months)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceLand Use Policy;(2019) Pagination 1,14en_US
dc.subjectsustainable intensificationen_US
dc.subjectfarm typologyen_US
dc.subjectdryland farming systemsen_US
dc.subjectinterventionsen_US
dc.subjectfarm household surveyen_US
dc.subjectarid landscapesen_US
dc.subjectsemi arid landscapesen_US
dc.subjectex-ante assessmenten_US
dc.subjectlivelihood assetsen_US
dc.subjectvillage studiesen_US
dc.titleFarm typology analysis and technology assessment: An application in an arid region of South Asiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2019-11-01en_US
dcterms.extent1-14en_US
cg.creator.idShalander, Kumar: 0000-0001-8072-5674en_US
cg.creator.idHaileslassie, Amare: 0000-0001-5237-9006en_US
cg.creator.idRathore, Abhishek: 0000-0001-6887-4095en_US
cg.creator.idWhitbread, Anthony: 0000-0003-4840-7670en_US
cg.subject.agrovocfarming systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocintensificationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocresilienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocindiaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocrajasthanen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Water Management Institute - IWMIen_US
cg.contributor.centerIndian Council of Agricultural Research - ICARen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals - GLDCen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR System Office - CGIAR - Sysen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionAustralia and New Zealanden_US
cg.coverage.countryETen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
cg.coverage.countryNPen_US
cg.coverage.countryNZen_US
cg.contactk.shalander@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104149en_US
cg.isijournalISI journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor3.573en_US
cg.issn0264-8377en_US
cg.journalLand Use Policyen_US
cg.issue88en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV