Show simple item record

dc.contributorUpadhyaya, Hari D.en_US
dc.creatorSharma, Shivalien_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T08:01:11Z
dc.date.available2020-02-17T08:01:11Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationShivali Sharma, Hari D. Upadhyaya. (1/4/2019). Photoperiod Response of Annual Wild Species and Cultivated Chickpea on Phenology, Growth, and Yield Traits. Crop Science, 59(2), pp. 632-639.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/10755
dc.description.abstractFrequent utilization of wild Cicer species in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement programs, as well as the regeneration of these wild species for efficient conservation in genebanks, is hindered due to photoperiod and/or temperature sensitivity (vernalization). In this study, the response to four extended photoperiod treatments (15, 18, 21, and 24 h) was compared with a control (12 h) for phenology and growth in terms of reduction in number of days to first flowering, as well as for yieldrelated traits in cultivated chickpea and seven annual wild Cicer species. The study revealed that wild Cicer species required long photoperiods (varying from 15 to 18 h) for transition from the vegetative to reproductive phase. Optimum photoperiods also improved agronomic traits such as pod number and seed yield per plant. Of the photoperiods studied, 18 h was the most appropriate photoperiod treatment for both reducing the vegetative phase and for efficient regeneration in C. reticulatum Ladiz. Fifteen hours was the most appropriate photoperiod in C. judaicum Boiss. and C. yamashitae Kitamura. Both 15 and 18 h were the most appropriate photoperiods in C. bijugum K.H. Rech. and C. pinnatifidum Jaub. & Sp., depending on the objective (15 h for regeneration and 18 h for reducing vegetative phase). Cicer chorassanicum (Bunge) M. Pop. and C. cuneatum Hochst. ex A. Rich. showed a weak response to all the extended photoperiod treatments. These results contribute to enhanced utilization of wild Cicer species for chickpea improvement through synchronization of flowering facilitating hybridization and for efficient regeneration by using speciesspecific extended photoperiod treatments.en_US
dc.formatTXTen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCrop Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dc.sourceCrop Science;59,(2019) Pagination 632,639en_US
dc.subjectcicer speciesen_US
dc.subjectchickpeaen_US
dc.subjectgenepool speciesen_US
dc.subjectChickpeaen_US
dc.titlePhotoperiod Response of Annual Wild Species and Cultivated Chickpea on Phenology, Growth, and Yield Traitsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2019-03-01en_US
dcterms.extent632-639en_US
dcterms.issued2019-04-01en_US
cg.subject.agrovocphenologyen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals - GLDCen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR System Office - CGIAR - Sysen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
cg.contactshivali.sharma@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.07.0438en_US
cg.isijournalISI journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.644en_US
cg.issn0011-183Xen_US
cg.journalCrop Scienceen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.volume59en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV