Show simple item record

dc.contributorGupta, Rajen_US
dc.contributorMartius, Christopheren_US
dc.contributorLamers, Johnen_US
dc.contributorDevkota, K.Pen_US
dc.contributorK.D., Sayreen_US
dc.contributorVlek, Paulen_US
dc.creatorDevkota Wasti, Minaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-30T20:02:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-30T20:02:25Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationMina Devkota Wasti, Raj Gupta, Christopher Martius, John Lamers, K. P Devkota, Sayre K. D. Paul Vlek. (1/4/2015). Soil salinity management on raised beds with different furrow irrigation modes in salt-affected lands. Agricultural Water Management, 152, pp. 243-250.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/10985
dc.description.abstractMismanagement of irrigation water and the ensuing secondary salinization are threatening the sustainability of irrigated agriculture especially in many dryland regions. The permanent raised-bed/furrow system, a water-wise conservation agriculture-based practice, is gaining importance for row- and high value-crops in irrigated agriculture. However, because of additional surface exposure and elevation, raised beds may be more prone to salt accumulation especially under shallow water table conditions. A field study was carried out in 2008 and 2009 in the Khorezm region, Central Asia, to investigate the effect of three furrow irrigation methods on salt dynamics of the soil and the performance of the cotton crop on the raised bed-furrow system. The irrigation methods compared included (i) Conventional furrow irrigation wherein every furrow was irrigated (EFI) at each irrigation event; (ii) Alternate skip furrow irrigation (ASFI where one of two neighbouring furrows were alternately irrigated during consecutive irrigations events; and (iii) Permanent skip furrow irrigation (PSFI) during which irrigation was permanently skipped in one of the two neighbouring furrows during all irrigation events. For salinity management with PSFI a ‘managed salt accumulation and effective leaching’ approach was pursued. The EFI method increased salt accumulation on the top of the raised beds. In contrast, the PSFI method allowed an effective salt leaching from the top of the raised beds. After leaching, salinity on top of the beds under PSFI was reduced to <3 dS m−1 compared to 5–6 dS m−1 under ASFI and EFI indicating an effective leaching with the PSFI method. Raw cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., cv. Khorezm 127) yield was higher under the PSFI (2003 kg ha−1) method having yield increases of 984 kg ha−1 (96% higher) and 787 kg ha−1 (64% higher) than under EFI (1216 kg ha−1) and ASFI (1019 kg ha−1) methods, respectively. Better crop performance with PSFI was linked with the lesser salinization of the raised beds and a larger salt free root zone before the leaching events. In addition, the PSFI method reduced irrigation water demand contributed thus to minimizing secondary soil salinization. Thus, PSFI could be an effective method to manage the salt under raised beds in salt-affected irrigated arid regions.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management;152,(2015) Pagination 243-250en_US
dc.subjectsalt-leachingen_US
dc.titleSoil salinity management on raised beds with different furrow irrigation modes in salt-affected landsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-02-14en_US
dcterms.extent243-250en_US
dcterms.issued2015-04-01en_US
cg.creator.idDevkota Wasti, Mina: 0000-0002-2348-4816en_US
cg.subject.agrovocuzbekistanen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfurrow irrigationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocraised bedsen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Bonn, Center for Development Research - Uni-Bonn - ZEFen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe Borlaug Institute for South Asia - BISAen_US
cg.contributor.centerCenter for International Forestry Research - CIFORen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Rice Research Institute - IRRIen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR System Organization - CGIARen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionCentral Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUZen_US
cg.contactm.devkota@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.013en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor3.542en_US
cg.issn0378-3774en_US
cg.journalAgricultural Water Managementen_US
cg.volume152en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV