Show simple item record

dc.contributorMartius, Christopheren_US
dc.contributorLamers, Johnen_US
dc.contributorK.D., Sayreen_US
dc.contributorDevkota, Krishnaen_US
dc.contributorVlek, Paulen_US
dc.creatorDevkota Wasti, Minaen_US
dc.date2013-11-13en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T21:53:34Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T21:53:34Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationMina Devkota Wasti, Christopher Martius, John Lamers, Sayre K. D. Krishna Devkota, Paul Vlek. (13/11/2013). Tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated cotton. Soil and Tillage Research, 134, pp. 72-82.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/10992
dc.description.abstractManagement practices may influence yield and nitrogen (N) use efficiency of irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in irrigated arid lands such as those of the Aral Sea basin. A field experiment was conducted to compare the effects of conservation tillage (permanent raised beds; PB) with conventional plow tillage (CT) under three different N application rates (0, 125 and 250 kg ha−1) on cotton growth, yield, N use efficiency and N balance in irrigated arid lands of Uzbekistan for two years. Raw cotton yield and yield components were not affected by tillage methods in both years. However, yield and yield components significantly increased when N fertilizer rate was increased from zero to 125 kg ha−1 N application. When the N rate was doubled from 125 to 250 kg ha−1, a relatively much lower increment was observed in both tillage methods. The groundwater nitrate concentration was reduced considerably, while efficiency of applied N was increased in 2009, i.e., after introduction of the cover crop in the cotton mono cropping system, compared to 2008. The efficiency of the applied N decreased with increased N application rate. Tillage method did not affect agronomic N use efficiency in both years. However, in the 2nd year, apparent N recovery efficiency was higher in PB than in CT, while physiological N use efficiency with N-250 was 54% lower in PB than in CT. The apparent system N balance was negative with N-0 and N-125, but positive (N loss) with high N application (250 kg ha−1) with both tillage methods. A significant interaction effect between tillage and N level was observed; with N-0, CT had a 32% higher negative N balance than PB. With N-250, CT had a significantly higher positive N balance (N loss), more than twice as high (66 kg ha−1) as for PB. Thus, cotton cultivation in PB with proper N application and the introduction of a winter cover crop can be considered a viable alternative to the present unsustainable CT cotton mono-cropping system in irrigated arid lands, assuming the patterns are confirmed in the long-run.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier (12 months)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceSoil and Tillage Research;134,(2013) Pagination 72,82en_US
dc.subjectpermanent bedsen_US
dc.subjectapparent nitrogen balanceen_US
dc.titleTillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated cottonen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idDevkota Wasti, Mina: 0000-0002-2348-4816en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocuzbekistanen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccover cropsen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Bonn, Center for Development Research - Uni-Bonn - ZEFen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR System Organization - CGIARen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionCentral Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUZen_US
cg.contactm.devkota@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor4.675en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV