Show simple item record

dc.contributorAlemu, Biruken_US
dc.contributorKinati, Woleen_US
dc.contributorMulem, Anneten_US
dc.contributorEerdewijk, Anouka vanen_US
dc.contributorWieland, Barbaraen_US
dc.creatorDesta, Hiwoten_US
dc.date2020-03-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-07T07:36:29Z
dc.date.available2020-10-07T07:36:29Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/b207d7b605a682edb27c21ef0a3ccb97en_US
dc.identifier.citationHiwot Desta, Biruk Alemu, Wole Kinati, Annet Mulem, Anouka van Eerdewijk, Barbara Wieland. (1/3/2020). Contribution of small ruminants to food security for Ethiopian smallholder farmers. Small Ruminant Research, 184.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/11858
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates how and to what extent arguments related to food security influence preference of livestock species for women and men. Data was collected in four regions of Ethiopia through 92 focus group discussions (FGD) in communities where small ruminant production is common, Using a gender sensitive study designs, 23 FGDs were held separately with men, women and youth (male and female), and through a household survey involving 217 male and 212 women. Qualitative analysis was conducted to extract reasons given to explain the importance of livestock. Reasons related to food security were mapped to the four dimensions underpinning food security—accessibility, availability, nutritional value and stability. All FGDs considered sheep the most important livestock species, followed by cattle, with women allocating higher scores to sheep than men. All four dimensions of food security came up in statements explaining the importance of species but with variations across species. Interestingly, food security related arguments were most prevalent for goats followed by poultry. Of reasons given by women concerning the importance of goats, 78 % were related to food security with all four dimensions represented, and 52 % for poultry with two dimensions (availability and nutritional value). Answers from men especially had a stronger focus on economic reasons directly linked to income generation. Nevertheless, 64 % of men’s arguments for goats were related to food security. For sheep however, women only scored higher for arguments related to availability. When investigating purpose of small ruminant production at household level through a household survey, the importance of small ruminants for food security were confirmed; however, gender differences were less apparent. Being able to sell animals at short notice was the main reason for keeping small ruminants for both women and men followed by meat and milk for home consumption. Women’s argument for prioritizing selling were accessibility. For men, key arguments for selling were related to availability. For meat and milk their nutritional value was an important argument. Comparing agroecologies, accessibility (selling) was ranked top in highland areas and nutritional value (milk) was most important in lowland areas. In conclusion, this study provides much needed evidence on how small ruminants contribute to different dimensions of food security and are promising entry points targeting women to improve food and nutritional security by providing adequate animal source foods in a household.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceSmall Ruminant Research;184,(2020)en_US
dc.subjectpreferenceen_US
dc.titleContribution of small ruminants to food security for Ethiopian smallholder farmersen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idKinati, Wole: 0000-0002-4791-9802en_US
cg.creator.idWieland, Barbara: 0000-0003-4020-9186en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfood securityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgenderen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmall ruminantsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocethiopiaen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerRoyal Tropical Institute - KITen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systems - LAFSen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryETen_US
cg.contacth.desta@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106064en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.273en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV