Show simple item record

dc.contributorPiggin, Colinen_US
dc.contributorHaddad, Atefen_US
dc.contributorHajdibo, A.en_US
dc.contributorHayek, Pierreen_US
dc.contributorKhalil, Yaseenen_US
dc.creatorSommer, Rolfen_US
dc.date2012-06-14en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-11T23:16:05Z
dc.date.available2020-11-11T23:16:05Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationRolf Sommer, Colin Piggin, Atef Haddad, A. Hajdibo, Pierre Hayek, Yaseen Khalil. (14/6/2012). Simulating The Effects Of Zero Tillage And Crop Residue Retention On Water Relations And Yield Of Wheat Under Rainfed Semiarid Mediterranean Conditions. Field Crops Research, 132, pp. 40-52.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12019
dc.description.abstractMany studies have shown that zero tillage (ZT) in combination with a surface crop residue layer - two components of conservation agriculture (CA) practice - can improve the agronomic water balance by increasing the amount of water that is readily plant available. However, no account has yet been published in which this effect had been fully quantified under rainfed semiarid Mediterranean conditions. To tackle the issue, in the 2009/2010 cropping season we studied the soil water dynamics of wheat grown after barley in northern Syria under two contrasting tillage regimes (zero tillage vs. conventional tillage, CT), two levels of surface residue retention (partial and full) and early and late planting. For a comprehensive quantification of the water balance, we applied the crop-soil simulation model CropSyst for the season under study and for the period 1980-2010 (30 years). Results showed that planting date had a notable impact on crop performance and yield (30-year average, early: 2.68 Mg/ha; late: 2.30 Mg/ha). Simulations indicated that planting wheat immediately after the first sufficient rainfall in autumn bears little risk of crop failure due to early season droughts, and more should be done to encourage farmers to do so. ZT and residue management changed yields only very little, even though in 25 out of 30 years, ZT yields were higher than CT yields. About 55% of the seasonal precipitation (similar to 150 mm) was lost by unproductive soil evaporation, whereas ZT and residue retention had only a minor mitigating impact; too little to be clearly distinguishable by field observations. A potential obstacle for meticulous simulation of CA with CropSyst is the model's inability to simulating the dynamic nature of tillage, i.e. its decreasing impact over time, and the beneficial effect of ZT and residue retention on soil water infiltration. However we argue that such impact may be limited on soils with self-mulching characteristics that are common in the region of this study. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dc.sourceField Crops Research;132,(2012) Pagination 40,52en_US
dc.subjectresidue managementen_US
dc.subjectcrop modelingen_US
dc.titleSimulating The Effects Of Zero Tillage And Crop Residue Retention On Water Relations And Yield Of Wheat Under Rainfed Semiarid Mediterranean Conditionsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idSommer, Rolf: 0000-0001-7599-9056en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdroughten_US
cg.subject.agrovocplanting dateen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfrosten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contactr.sommer@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.024en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor4.308en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV