Show simple item record

dc.contributorMugera, Aminen_US
dc.contributorYigezu, Yigezuen_US
dc.creatorAl-Shater, Tameren_US
dc.date2020-05-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T22:39:39Z
dc.date.available2020-11-12T22:39:39Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/81b3eb1e03faa898a0950b0a485bf1efen_US
dc.identifier.citationTamer Al-Shater, Amin Mugera, Yigezu Yigezu. (1/5/2020). Implications of Adoption of Zero Tillage (ZT) on Productive Efficiency and Production Risk of Wheat Production. Sustainability, 12 (9).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12032
dc.description.abstractThe impacts of zero tillage (ZT) on soil physical, biological, and chemical properties have been fairly documented in the literature. However, there is still an information gap in the developing world in general and in integrated crop–livestock production systems in dry areas of the world in particular. Using a sample of 621 farmers in Syria, this study assessed the implications of adoption of ZT technology on productive efficiency, input-specific resource use efficiency, and production risk. A stochastic production frontier model, which explicitly and simultaneously accounts for technical inefficiency and production risk, was used to estimate total factor and input-specific technical efficiencies and the risk of obtaining lower levels of yields for each of the sampled farms. Model results show that adoption of ZT proved to be an effective risk management strategy in this dryland production system, where it led to 95% and 33.3% reductions in the risk of obtaining wheat yield levels below 1000 kg/ha and 1500 kg/ha, respectively. Overall, the results have a clear indication that using ZT leads to improvements in productive efficiency as the adoption of ZT led to 93% reduction in the risk of obtaining efficiency levels below 40%. Future research will be needed to shed light on whether coupling ZT with the other components of conservation agriculture will reverse some of these effects.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceSustainability;12,(2020)en_US
dc.subjectconventional cultivationen_US
dc.subjectstochastic frontier analysisen_US
dc.subjectproduction risken_US
dc.subjectWheaten_US
dc.titleImplications of Adoption of Zero Tillage (ZT) on Productive Efficiency and Production Risk of Wheat Productionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idAl-Shater, Tamer: 0000-0002-0698-689Xen_US
cg.creator.idYigezu, Yigezu: 0000-0002-9156-7082en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation tillageen_US
cg.subject.agrovocreproductive efficiencyen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe University of Western Australia, Institute of Agriculture - UWA - IOAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.projectCRP WHEAT Phase IIen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contacttamer_149@hotmail.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12093640en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.576en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV