Show simple item record

dc.contributorAl-Yassin, Adnanen_US
dc.contributorOmer, Siraj Osmanen_US
dc.creatorSingh, Murarien_US
dc.date2015-04-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T19:58:59Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T19:58:59Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/3a51b9adfdd1f02ea8eea076c0f61b81en_US
dc.identifier.citationMurari Singh, Adnan Al-Yassin, Siraj Osman Omer. (1/4/2015). Bayesian Estimation of Genotypes Means, Precision, and Genetic Gain Due to Selection from Routinely Used Barley Trials. Crop Science, 55 (2), pp. 501-513.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12069
dc.description.abstractBlock designs are normally used in evaluation of crop varieties. The responses or yield data arising from designed trials in a crop variety improvement program are generally analyzed using linear mixed models under the frequentist paradigm. Such analysis ignores information on the genotypic parameters available from previous similar trials. Another approach with a relatively wider inferential framework is Bayesian, which integrates the prior information with the likelihood of current data. While the Bayesian approach has been implemented in numerous situations, stepwise presentation of its application in routine crop variety trials is not available. Illustrated with a dataset from a resolvable incomplete block design, this study provides a working tool for Bayesian analysis based on priors available from a series of crop variety trials. The posterior estimates of predicted values of mean of genotypes and precision, coefficient of variation, heritability, and genetic gain due to selection were obtained. The a posteriori mean of experimental error variance, coefficient of variation, and genotypic variance were lower for the Bayesian than the frequentist approach. The precision of a posteriori means was higher than that of predicted means under the frequentist approach. Accounting for incomplete blocks, rather than ignoring them, using a Bayesian approach showed a large reduction in estimates of error variance components and large increases in heritability and genetic gain. The current a posteriori distributions also serve as updated priors for future analysis. The step-by-step procedure presented here is recommended for routine analysis of variety trials.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCrop Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceCrop Science;55,(2014) Pagination 501,513en_US
dc.subjectbayesian estimationen_US
dc.subjectBarleyen_US
dc.titleBayesian Estimation of Genotypes Means, Precision, and Genetic Gain Due to Selection from Routinely Used Barley Trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idSingh, Murari: 0000-0001-5450-0949en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgenotypesen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contactM.SINGH@CGIAR.ORGen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0111en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.878en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV