Show simple item record

dc.contributorGarabet, S.en_US
dc.creatorHarmsen, K.en_US
dc.date2009-08-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T22:24:54Z
dc.date.available2020-11-23T22:24:54Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/bfad083aa45cbd63fd48379249e833a5en_US
dc.identifier.citationK. Harmsen, S. Garabet. (1/8/2009). A comparison of the isotope-dilution and the difference method for estimating fertilizer nitrogen recovery fractions in crops. III. Experimental. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 51 (3), pp. 237-261.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12084
dc.description.abstractFertilizer nitrogen (N) recovery fractions may be calculated by the difference or the isotope-dilution method. With the first method an apparent recovery fraction (ARF) and with the latter method a 15N recovery fraction (15NRF) is calculated. The two methods may give different results, ARF generally being higher than 15NRF, particularly in the higher range of ARF-values. Fertilizer N recovery fractions in crops calculated by the two methods were compared using experimental data derived from the literature. The experimental results could be largely explained on the basis of theoretical relationships between 15NRF and ARF, based on the assumptions of (1) complete and instantaneous mixing of initial soil mineral N and fertilizer N, and (2) zero order kinetics for plant uptake, mineralization and immobilization reactions. In the lower range of ARF-values, values of 15NRF exceeded those of ARF, presumably because the plant derives its N from fertilizer as well as soil N, even if there is no crop response to applied N. In the higher range of ARF-values, 15NRF tended to be lower than ARF, presumably because of the occurrence of mineralization-immobilization turnover, which causes the 15N content of the mineral N pool to decrease. This phenomenon, referred to as ‘pool substitution’, may be enhanced by increased uptake efficiency of soil N by fertilized crops or by increased mineralization in fertilized treatments. From an agronomic point of view, the use of ARF would be preferred, as this quantity accurately reflects the overall effect of fertilizer application on crop N uptake. 15NRF is a meaningful quantity in rebalance studies. It accurately estimates the fertilizer N recovery in the crop, provided 4N released in mineralization-immobilization turnover in soil is not considered fertilizer N. The theory developed in the present series of papers may contribute to the understanding of the dynamics and transformations of fertilizer N in soil-crop systems and thus help to develop criteria for efficient and effective fertilizer N management.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyrighted; Non-commercial use onlyen_US
dc.sourceNJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences;51,(2009) Pagination 237,261en_US
dc.subjectapparent recovery fractionen_US
dc.subject15n recovery fractionen_US
dc.subjectn fertilizer efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectpool substitutionen_US
dc.subjectadded n interactionen_US
dc.subjectorganic nen_US
dc.subjectmineral nen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the isotope-dilution and the difference method for estimating fertilizer nitrogen recovery fractions in crops. III. Experimentalen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.agrovocimmobilizationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmineralizationen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation - UT - ITCen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerCentre for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and the Pacific - CSSTEAPen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contactharmsen@itc.nlen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(03)80018-0en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.608en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV