Show simple item record

dc.contributorAtef, Yousrien_US
dc.creatorSwelam, Atefen_US
dc.date2012-05-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T18:09:58Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T18:09:58Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/f951e04d46aa9165741a3171b1a90dbben_US
dc.identifier.citationAtef Swelam, Yousri Atef. (1/5/2012). Improve water saving and water productivity by new approach of farm management under surface irrigation. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering "MJAE", 29 (2), pp. 745-762.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12227
dc.description.abstractTwo field experiments were conducted during summer seasons of 2007 and 2008 at Zankalon Water Research Station, Water Management and Irrigation Systems Research Institute, Egypt. This research aims to study the effect of new approach of farm layout and management under surface irrigation on water saving and yield of corn. Three irrigation and planting treatments were investigated, treatment A used traditional irrigation method (control treatment) with 80 cm width furrows and one row of plants on each ridge with one plant/hill and 22 cm between hills. Treatment B had 80 cm wide furrows with one row planted in the bottom of each furrow with one plant/hill and 22 cm between hills. Treatment C had 160 cm wide furrows with two rows planted in the bottom of each furrow with one plant/hill and 22 cm between hills. Comparisons were based on the growth, yield, yield attributes, water relations, and the net return of the corn crop (cultivar T.W.C310). Comparing to the traditional practice (treatment A) water saving from using treatments B and C were 2467 m3 ha-1 (30.3%) and 4333 m3 ha-1 (53.2%), respectively. Actual evapotranspiration values for treatments A, B and C were 553, 410 and 293 mm respectively. The values of water productivity (kg m-3) were 0.74, 1.13 and 1.73 for A, B and C treatments, respectively. The lowest irrigation cost was observed for method C and the net profit increased by 19% using treatment B and 32% using treatment C. Significant increase in grain yield was achieved, 6% and 9% for the B and C treatments, respectively.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherThe Egyptian Society of Agricultural Engineering “MSAE”en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceMisr Journal of Agricultural Engineering "MJAE";29,(2012) Pagination 745-762en_US
dc.subjectcornen_US
dc.subjectin-furrow plantingen_US
dc.titleImprove water saving and water productivity by new approach of farm management under surface irrigationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.extent745-762en_US
cg.creator.idSwelam, Atef: 0000-0002-5220-9901en_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater savingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmaizeen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater productivityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsurface irrigationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocMaizeen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Water Research Center - NWRCen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contacta.swelam@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.21608/MJAE.2012.102345en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.journalMisr Journal of Agricultural Engineering "MJAE"en_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.volume29en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV