Show simple item record

dc.contributorDhehibi, Boubakeren_US
dc.contributorAwaideh, Alaen_US
dc.contributorHadidi, Omamah Taysir Taheren_US
dc.contributorHaddad, Miraen_US
dc.contributorStrohmeier, Stefanen_US
dc.creatorEl-Hiary, Masnaten_US
dc.date2021-01-26en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-20T14:52:26Z
dc.date.available2021-02-20T14:52:26Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/30dc0fce7d47ba4a28b010a2bab6ec5cen_US
dc.identifier.citationMasnat El-Hiary, Boubaker Dhehibi, Ala Awaideh, Omamah Taysir Taher Hadidi, Mira Haddad, Stefan Strohmeier. (26/1/2021). Farmers' Attitudes Towards Treated Sludge (Biosolids) use in Agriculture: Evidence from Jordanian Badia. Jordan: National Agricultural Research Center Jordan (NARC Jordan).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12537
dc.description.abstractThe application of treated sludge (biosolids) on agricultural land has been widely acknowledged, given the cost-effectiveness of this method and its easy use. When appropriately applied to agricultural land, sludge can replenish organic matter and nutrients in the soil. Although treated biosolid has been used in agriculture in many parts of the world, its acceptability varies with farmers' different cultures and beliefs. Literature review reveals that farmers' concerns on sludge use are primarily due to its anthropogenic origin, pollutants that it carries, and a general perception of treated biosolid being unsafe and risky. This research investigates farmers' perceptions of land application of treated sludge (biosolid) on their farm. This study targeted Al Majeddyeh farming community located in Jordanian Badia. Surveys were conducted with randomly selected 20 farmers in this village. Overall, farmers' perception of land application of treated biosolids is negative, and the majority of the farmers don't want to use treated biosolids for several reasons such as their trust in the suitability of the treated biosolid; concerns on the consumed product (transfer of disease); lack of knowledge on the biosolid properties and advantages and disadvantages of sludge use in agriculture. In terms of the most critical factors influencing farmers' fertilizer purchasing decision were: the safety of fertilizer, nutrient content, organic matter, water holding capacity, recommended by a trusted source, suggested volumes apply, price of the fertilizer, fertilizer application, and know of someone who used it. The survey also revealed that all respondents didn't use treated biosolids before. In terms of accepting manure mixed with biosolids, most of the respondents refused manure mixed with biosolids, and only 20% accepted this mixture. This study's findings are valuable for Jordanian decision-makers in their roles to promote the use of treated bio-solid sludge as fertilizers and soil conditioners. The Agriculture and Extension Services in the Agriculture Ministry should encourage farmers to use treated sludge (biosolid) in their community. Results suggest that land application of biosolid sludge can be accepted by more farmers if farmers are well trained for the safe and effective use of treated biosolid. Launching awareness programs about the benefits of treated biosolids and improving farmers' perceptions on its land application; raising public awareness by holding training workshops and conducting surveys about the efficient application of treated sludge (biosolid).en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherNational Agricultural Research Center Jordan (NARC Jordan)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-SA-4.0en_US
dc.subjectjordan badiaen_US
dc.subjectfertilizeren_US
dc.subjectfarmers' perceptionen_US
dc.subjectland applicationen_US
dc.subjecttreated biosoliden_US
dc.subjectagropastoral systemen_US
dc.titleFarmers' Attitudes Towards Treated Sludge (Biosolids) use in Agriculture: Evidence from Jordanian Badiaen_US
dc.typeInternal Reporten_US
cg.creator.idDhehibi, Boubaker: 0000-0003-3854-6669en_US
cg.creator.idHaddad, Mira: 0000-0002-9450-1599en_US
cg.creator.idStrohmeier, Stefan: 0000-0003-0723-5964en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Agricultural Research Center Jordan - NARC Jordanen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems - WLEen_US
cg.contributor.funderMinistry of Foreign Affairs - MINBUZAen_US
cg.contributor.funderUnited States Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service - USDA-USFSen_US
cg.contributor.projectTracing Soil Amendment Impacts of Processed Bio-solids on the Rehabilitation of Jordan’s Agro-pastoral Areasen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2022-01-31en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryJOen_US
cg.coverage.admin-unitAmman Governorateen_US
cg.coverage.geolocationLatitude: 31.73121988234436; Longitude: 36.123892389076914en_US
cg.contactB.Dhehibi@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://www.icarda.org/media/blog/protecting-soil-protecting-peopleen_US
mel.funder.grant#United States Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service - USDA-USFS :2019/046/108484/EWHen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV