Show simple item record

dc.contributorPILBEAM, C. J.en_US
dc.contributorHarris, Hen_US
dc.contributorTuladhar, J.en_US
dc.creatorWood, M.en_US
dc.date1998-01-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T22:58:14Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T22:58:14Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationM. Wood, C. J. PILBEAM, H Harris, J. Tuladhar. (1/1/1998). Productivity and nitrogen use of three different wheat-based rotations in North West Syria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49 (3), pp. 451-458.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13301
dc.description.abstractProductivity of 3 different 2-year crop rotations, namely continuous wheat, wheat-chickpea, and wheat-fallow, was measured over 4 consecutive seasons beginning in 1991-92 at the ICARDA station, Tel Hadya, Syria. Nitrogen (N) fertiliser (30 kg N/ha at sowing) was broadcast every other year in the continuous wheat only. 15N-labelled fertiliser was used to quantify the amount of nitrogen supplied to the crops through current and past applications of fertiliser and by N2 fixation. The remaining N in the crop was assumed to come from the soil. In any single season, wheat yields were unaffected by rotation or N level. However, 2-year biomass production was significantly greater (32%, on average) in the continuously cropped plots than in the wheat-fallow rotation. On average, <10% of the N in the wheat crop came from fertiliser in the season of application, and <1·2 kg N/ha of the residual fertiliser was recovered by a subsequent wheat crop. Chickpea fixed 16-48 kg N/ha, depending on the season, but a negative soil N budget was still likely because the amount of N removed in the grain was usually greater than the amount of atmospheric N2 fixed. Uptake of soil N was similar in the cereal phase of all 3 rotations (38 kg N/ha, on average), but over the whole rotation at least 33% more soil N was removed from continuously cropped plots than from the wheat-fallow rotation, suggesting that the latter is a more sustainable system. A laboratory study showed that although wheat and chickpea residues enhanced the gross rate of N mineralisation by c. 50%, net rates of N mineralisation were usually negative. Given the high C/N ratio of the residue, immobilisation, rather than loss processes, is the likely cause of the decline in the mineral N content of the soil. Consequently, decomposition of crop residues in the field may in the short term reduce rather than increase the availability of N for crop growth.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen_US
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research;49,Pagination 451-458en_US
dc.subjectn fixationen_US
dc.subjectsoil nen_US
dc.subjectchickpeaen_US
dc.titleProductivity and nitrogen use of three different wheat-based rotations in North West Syriaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.extent451-458en_US
cg.subject.agrovocsustainabilityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfallowen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Reading - UORen_US
cg.contributor.centerNepal Agricultural Research Council - NARC Nepalen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contactunknown99@unknown1.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1071/A97015en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
cg.issn0004-9409en_US
cg.journalAustralian Journal of Agricultural Researchen_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.volume49en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV