dc.contributor | PILBEAM, C. J. | en_US |
dc.contributor | Harris, H | en_US |
dc.contributor | Tuladhar, J. | en_US |
dc.creator | Wood, M. | en_US |
dc.date | 1998-01-01 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-30T22:58:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-30T22:58:14Z | |
dc.identifier | https://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limited | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | M. Wood, C. J. PILBEAM, H Harris, J. Tuladhar. (1/1/1998). Productivity and nitrogen use of three different wheat-based rotations in North West Syria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49 (3), pp. 451-458. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13301 | |
dc.description.abstract | Productivity of 3 different 2-year crop rotations, namely continuous wheat, wheat-chickpea, and wheat-fallow, was measured over 4 consecutive seasons beginning in 1991-92 at the ICARDA station, Tel Hadya, Syria. Nitrogen (N) fertiliser (30 kg N/ha at sowing) was broadcast every other year in the continuous wheat only. 15N-labelled fertiliser was used to quantify the amount of nitrogen supplied to the crops through current and past applications of fertiliser and by N2 fixation. The remaining N in the crop was assumed to come from the soil.
In any single season, wheat yields were unaffected by rotation or N level. However, 2-year biomass production was significantly greater (32%, on average) in the continuously cropped plots than in the wheat-fallow rotation. On average, <10% of the N in the wheat crop came from fertiliser in the season of application, and <1·2 kg N/ha of the residual fertiliser was recovered by a subsequent wheat crop. Chickpea fixed 16-48 kg N/ha, depending on the season, but a negative soil N budget was still likely because the amount of N removed in the grain was usually greater than the amount of atmospheric N2 fixed. Uptake of soil N was similar in the cereal phase of all 3 rotations (38 kg N/ha, on average), but over the whole rotation at least 33% more soil N was removed from continuously cropped plots than from the wheat-fallow rotation, suggesting that the latter is a more sustainable system.
A laboratory study showed that although wheat and chickpea residues enhanced the gross rate of N mineralisation by c. 50%, net rates of N mineralisation were usually negative. Given the high C/N ratio of the residue, immobilisation, rather than loss processes, is the likely cause of the decline in the mineral N content of the soil. Consequently, decomposition of crop residues in the field may in the short term reduce rather than increase the availability of N for crop growth. | en_US |
dc.format | PDF | en_US |
dc.language | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | CSIRO Publishing | en_US |
dc.source | Australian Journal of Agricultural Research;49,Pagination 451-458 | en_US |
dc.subject | n fixation | en_US |
dc.subject | soil n | en_US |
dc.subject | chickpea | en_US |
dc.title | Productivity and nitrogen use of three different wheat-based rotations in North West Syria | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dcterms.extent | 451-458 | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | sustainability | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | fallow | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | Wheat | en_US |
cg.contributor.center | International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDA | en_US |
cg.contributor.center | University of Reading - UOR | en_US |
cg.contributor.center | Nepal Agricultural Research Council - NARC Nepal | en_US |
cg.contributor.funder | International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDA | en_US |
cg.contributor.project | Communication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS) | en_US |
cg.contributor.project-lead-institute | International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDA | en_US |
cg.date.embargo-end-date | Timeless | en_US |
cg.coverage.region | Western Asia | en_US |
cg.coverage.country | SY | en_US |
cg.contact | unknown99@unknown1.com | en_US |
cg.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1071/A97015 | en_US |
cg.isijournal | ISI Journal | en_US |
dc.identifier.status | Timeless limited access | en_US |
cg.issn | 0004-9409 | en_US |
cg.journal | Australian Journal of Agricultural Research | en_US |
cg.issue | 3 | en_US |
cg.volume | 49 | en_US |