Show simple item record

dc.contributorSghaier, Mongien_US
dc.contributorFleskens, Luuken_US
dc.contributorOuessar, Mohameden_US
dc.contributorFrija, Aymenen_US
dc.contributorAw-Hassan, Aden A.en_US
dc.creatorAbdeladhim, Mohamed Arbien_US
dc.date2015-12-18en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T21:28:38Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T21:28:38Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/KTIEQWPPen_US
dc.identifier.citationMohamed Arbi Abdeladhim, Mongi Sghaier, Luuk Fleskens, Mohamed Ouessar, Aymen Frija, Aden A. Aw-Hassan. (18/12/2015). Assessing the impact of Soil and conservation techniques in South East Tunisia. Amman, Jordan: CRP on Dryland Systems (DS).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/3422
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the financial, economic and social feasibility of the investments in soil and water conservation techniques and their impacts on the livelihood conditions of the local population in the Oum Zessar watershed located in south-east Tunisia. The study uses Integrated Impact assessment framework, based on two main approaches: Extended Cost-Benefit Analysis (ECBA) to internalise environmental externalities and Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA). Results show that coupling the two methods is useful to upscale impact assessment from field level to regional level and to cover the impacts on different rural household capitals (human, financial, physical, natural and social) influencing well-being of the local population. The analysis for 30 years period found that, despite environmental externalities in the form of increased flood damage, investments in water harvesting techniques are beneficial at private and social levels for the local population. The financial analysis show that these investments are highly beneficial with 30 years IRR of 24% and a positive NPV of 3615 TD/ha at 10% discount rate. The economic analysis using market prices and accounting for subsidies, the investment becomes even more interesting with a NPV of 4283 TD/ha (discount rate of 10%) and an IRR of 27%, which is a clear improvement compared to the financial analysis. These results are robustly positive at a high discount rate of 12% (NPV of 2073 DT/ha) and reduced benefits when considered some negative environmental effects such as higher flood damage due to failure of Jessours (NPV of 1333 DT/ha and IRR of 20%). Besides the financial and economic benefits, the impacts of the soil and water conservation techniques in had clear and positive impacts on the livelihoods of the local population. Recommendations for a more integrated policy approach to watershed management are provided.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCRP on Dryland Systems (DS)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.subjectsustainable livelihoods approach (sla)en_US
dc.subjectextended costbenefit analysis (ecba)en_US
dc.subjectexternalitiesen_US
dc.subjectoum zessar watersheden_US
dc.subjectwater harvesting techniquesen_US
dc.titleAssessing the impact of Soil and conservation techniques in South East Tunisiaen_US
dc.typeInternal Reporten_US
cg.creator.idFrija, Aymen: 0000-0001-8379-9054en_US
cg.creator.idAw-Hassan, Aden A.: 0000-0002-9236-4949en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater harvestingen_US
cg.subject.agrovoctunisiaen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerArid Regions Institute - IRAen_US
cg.contributor.centerWageningen University & Research Centre - WURen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderCGIAR System Organization - CGIARen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryTNen_US
cg.coverage.start-date2014-01-01en_US
cg.coverage.end-date2016-12-31en_US
cg.contactmed.arbi.abdeladhim@gmail.comen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
@mire NV