Show simple item record

dc.contributorWesterberg, Vanjaen_US
dc.contributorMyint, Moeen_US
dc.creatorHodel, Eliasen_US
dc.date2015-12-31en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T21:29:25Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T21:29:25Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.eld-initiative.org/en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/BBNS48MMen_US
dc.identifier.citationElias Hodel, Vanja Westerberg, Moe Myint. (31/12/2015). An economic valuation of sustainable land management through agroforestry in eastern Sudan_Assessing the socio-economic and environmental dimensions of land degradation. Bonn, Germany: The ELD Initiative and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/3493
dc.description.abstractGedaref State was previously known as the food basket of Sudan. Over several decades unsustainable agricultural practices that combined near-monocropping with low nutrient replenishment have led to significant degradation of soils, which are no longer able to sustain farmer livelihoods. This study found that adopting an integrated sustainable land use and forest restoration scenario could reverse the current land degradation trend. The integration of Acacia senegal with sorghum, Sudan’s primary staple crop, was evaluated as a potential sustainable land management practice. A. senegal is a high quality gum arabic producing tree species, traditionally integrated into a crop and fallow system. It has soil nitrogen enhancing properties and international demand for its gum, make it a promising species to integrate in agricultural systems for both environmental and economic health. In parallel, consideration was also given to reforesting hills that have bare and exposed soil, with Luban gum trees such as Boswellia catering, Boswellia frererana, and Boswellia papyrifera. Currently these hills are not used for productive gains and have no competing land use, thus their reforestation would incur little to no opportunity costs. The valuation of both proposed integrated sustainable land management and forest restoration scenarios were undertaken using an ex-ante cost benefit analysis. An assessment of the ecosystem services and economic impact of restoration scenarios was carried out Executive summary using valuation techniques which included a productivity change approach, and replacement and avoided damage cost approaches. The analysis built on high-resolution remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical soil and water assessment tools, allowing for rigourous estimates of the impact of land use change on agricultural yields, groundwater infiltration, water runoff, and carbon sequestration. The results showed that the net present value returns to society as well as to the individual farmer of intercropping A. senegal trees with sorghum crops is significantly higher than that of continuing pure sorghum cultivation over a 25 year time horizon – the length of the productive life of A. senegal. At the farmer level, benefits of using an intercropping system outweigh the investment and management costs between three to four years after their establishment. However, favourable estimates of the financial returns from gum arabic offer no guarantee that the farmer will undertake gum production (Barbier 2000). This decision will depend on what returns can be obtained from other crops and the time profile of these returns, as argued in Barbier (1992). Thus, there are a number of fundamental policy initiatives necessary to encourage farmers to transition towards integrating A. senegal as part of a sustainable land management system, including security of tenure and access to credit, as well as maintenance of the actual producer price for gum arabic in the long term.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherThe ELD Initiative and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbHen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.titleAn economic valuation of sustainable land management through agroforestry in eastern Sudan_Assessing the socio-economic and environmental dimensions of land degradationen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
cg.subject.agrovocagroforestryen_US
cg.subject.agrovoceconomicsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocevaluationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocland managementen_US
cg.contributor.centerEconomics of Land Degradation Initiative - ELDen_US
cg.contributor.centerAltus - A Green Impact Laben_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contacteld@giz.deen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV