Show simple item record

dc.contributorSchmitt Olabisi, Lauraen_US
dc.contributorSakana, Naomien_US
dc.contributorWaldman, Kurten_US
dc.contributorGrabowski, Philipen_US
dc.creatorRichardson, Robert B.en_US
dc.date2015-08-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-15T07:08:07Z
dc.date.available2016-05-15T07:08:07Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/NUyrhGs9en_US
dc.identifier.citationRobert B. Richardson, Laura Schmitt Olabisi, Naomi Sakana, Kurt Waldman, Philip Grabowski. (1/8/2015). The impact of sustainable intensification on landscapes and livelihoods (SILL) in Zambia.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/4797
dc.description.abstractSustainable intensification interventions have the potential to mitigate the impact of agriculture on the landscape by intensifying agricultural production without increasing deforestation or the cultivation of more land and without reducing biodiversity (The Royal Society, 2009; Garnett et al., 2013; Keating et al., 2013). It is common think of intensification in terms of land as the key input and improving yields (productivity of the land) as the key objective. Pretty et al. (2011) define SI as (i) production of more food, feed, fiber, and/or fuel per unit of land, labor, and/or capital used; (ii) maintained and or improved natural resource base, including enhanced ecosystems services; and (iii) resilience to shocks and stresses, include climate change. SI practices could reduce agricultural encroachment into forests, preserving biodiversity and soil carbon stocks (Phalan et al., 2011; Pretty et al., 2011). Thus, SI approaches can potentially minimize environmental and long-term economic costs by increasing the efficiency of agricultural systems and by contributing to household and ecosystem resilience. SI approaches must include higher yields overall because most potentially useable land consists mainly of forests, wetlands, or grasslands, whose conversion would greatly increase emissions of greenhouse gases (Garnett et al., 2013), which is not sustainable in the long term. Increasing the land area in agriculture would also have significant environmental costs in terms of wildlife conservation, carbon storage, flood protection, recreation, and other ecosystem services.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.titleThe impact of sustainable intensification on landscapes and livelihoods (SILL) in Zambiaen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
cg.subject.agrovocsustainable intensificationen_US
cg.contributor.centerMichigan State University - MSUen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Food Policy Research Institute - IFPRIen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderUnited States Agency for International Development - USAIDen_US
cg.contributor.projectAfrica RISINGen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryZMen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/90en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV