Show simple item record

dc.contributorSastry, R. Kalpanaen_US
dc.contributorCraufurd, Peteren_US
dc.contributorMeinke, Holgeren_US
dc.contributorParsons, Daviden_US
dc.contributorRego, T.J.en_US
dc.contributorRathore, Abhisheken_US
dc.creatorNageswaraRao, V.en_US
dc.date2014-11-30en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-05T19:44:16Z
dc.date.available2017-01-05T19:44:16Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/SvDJgYTfen_US
dc.identifier.citationV. NageswaraRao, R. Kalpana Sastry, Peter Craufurd, Holger Meinke, David Parsons, T. J. Rego, Abhishek Rathore. (30/11/2014). Cropping systems strategy for effective management of Fusariumwilt in safflower. Field Crops Research, 156, pp. 191-198.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5346
dc.description.abstracttIn many parts of India intensive cultivation of safflower on Vertisols appears to have aggravated theproblem of Fusarium wilt in safflower due to the soil borne fungus, Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht f. sp.carthami Klisiwiez and Houstan (FOC). In a long-term field experiment at Patancheru, India, we evaluatedfour diverse dryland cropping systems that each included safflower for their effectiveness in control-ling Fusarium wilt in safflower. Sorghum (rainy season crop) and safflower (post-rainy season crop)were grown every alternate year as a two-year rotation with: (1) sorghum intercropped with pigeonpea(S/PP − S + SF); (2) cowpea intercropped with pigeonpea (C/PP − S + SF); (3) sorghum followed by chickpea(S + CP − S + SF); (4) sorghum followed by safflower (S + SF − S + SF). Continuous sorghum and safflower(S + SF − S + SF) had higher Fusarium wilt incidence of fully wilted safflower plants (31%) and a largerbuild-up of Fusarium propagules (1728 cfu g−1of soil) than other cropping systems. The inclusion of alegume such as chickpea in the rotation (S + CP − S + SF) reduced wilt incidence (7% fully wilted plants)and the level of inoculum in the soil to about 800 cfu g−1. There was a significant increase in safflowerseed yield and biomass yield (883 and 1733 kg ha−1, respectively) in the S + CP − S + SF rotation comparedwith the S + SF − S + SF rotation (605 and 1323 kg ha−1, respectively). Nitrogen application at rates of 0 to120 kg N ha−1had no effect on wilt incidence in safflower, but increased seed and biomass yield signif-icantly. Intercrop rotations (S/PP − S + SF and C/PP − S + SF) were less effective to manage the Fusariumwilt. The Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) was almost 10 times higher in the S + SF − S + SFrotation (2842) compared with the S + CP − S + SF rotation (297). Wilt progress throughout the season inall four systems was linear, with significant differences in intercepts and rates of disease progress amongcropping systems; the rate of disease progress was significantly greater in the S + SF − S + SF rotationcompared with the other three systems, which were similar. There was also a strong linear relationshipbetween wilt incidence and the number of Fusarium propagules in the soil; regressions had the sameslope but different intercepts in each system. There was no relationship between wilt incidence and seedyield; nitrogen had the largest effect on yields. A break from safflower cultivation for one year in the post-rainy season by growing chickpea as a sequential crop after sorghum, or as an intercrop with pigeonpeaand sorghum, combined with higher rates of nitrogen application to safflower appears to be an effectivestrategy for reducing Fusarium populations and sustaining safflower yielden_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceField Crops Research;156,(2014) Pagination 191,198en_US
dc.subjectfusarium oxysporum f. sp. carthamien_US
dc.subjectwilt disease managementaen_US
dc.subjectcropen_US
dc.subjectcropping systemen_US
dc.subjectchickpeaen_US
dc.titleCropping systems strategy for effective management of Fusariumwilt in saffloweren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idParsons, David: 0000-0002-1393-8431en_US
cg.creator.idRathore, Abhishek: 0000-0001-6887-4095en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsaffloweren_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerIndian Council of Agricultural Research, National Academy of Agricultural Research Management - ICAR-NAARMen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmanian Institute for Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2018-11-30en_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.474en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV