Show simple item record

dc.contributorMadakadze, Ignacioen_US
dc.contributorNyamangara, Justiceen_US
dc.contributorMafongoya, Paramuen_US
dc.creatorMavunganidze, Ziraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-09T20:56:45Z
dc.date.available2017-01-09T20:56:45Z
dc.identifierhttp://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/7350en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/bsqLqOsMen_US
dc.identifier.citationZira Mavunganidze, Ignacio Madakadze, Justice Nyamangara, Paramu Mafongoya. (30/11/2014). The impact of tillage system and herbicides on weed density, diversity and yield of cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L. ) and maize (Zea mays L. ) under the smallholder sector. Crop Protection, 58, pp. 25-32.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5381
dc.description.abstractThe study was carried out to evaluate the impact of tillage system in combination with different herbicides on weed density, diversity, crop growth and yields on 18 farms in Kadoma, Zimbabwe. Experiments were set up as a split plot design with three replications on each farm. Tillage was the main plot (Conservation Tillage (CT), Conventional Tillage (CONV)) and weeding option (hand weeding, cyanazine, atrazine, glyphosate only and mixture of cyanazine þ alachlor and atrazine þ alachlor) as the sub-plots. Due to the heterogeneous nature of farmers’ resource base, the farms were grouped into three farm types: high (Type 1), medium (Type 2) and poorly resourced farmers (Type 3). The hand hoe weeded treatments had 49 percent higher total weed densities in CT relative to CONV, and was statistically similar to the glyphosate treatment. The mixed pre-emergence herbicides reduced the diversity indices by 69 and 70 percent when compared to the hand hoe weeded treatment under CT in cotton and maize, respectively. The effectiveness of all pre-emergence herbicides were not influenced by tillage but were affected by farmers resource endowments with pronounced effect in Farm Type 1. Maximum plant heights of 85 and 238 cm were recorded for mixed pre-emergence herbicides under CT for cotton and maize, respectively. Minimum plant heights of 75 and 217 cm were recorded for the respective hand hoe weeded treatments. The hand hoe weeded treatments resulted in average cotton lint yield of 1497 and 2018 kg ha 1 for maize. The mixed pre-emergence herbicides treatments gave yields of 2138 and 2356 kg ha 1 of cotton and maize, respectively. The higher weed densities in CT under hand weeded treatments underscored the need for other weeding options. Similarly, a mixture of cyanazine þ alachlor in cotton and atrazine þ alachlor in maize is recommended for suppressing broad and grass weed populations and enhancing yields in CT systems.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceCrop Protection;58,(2014) Pagination 25,32en_US
dc.subjectweeding systemen_US
dc.subjectcyanazine atrazineen_US
dc.subjectMaizeen_US
dc.subjectCottonen_US
dc.titleThe impact of tillage system and herbicides on weed density, diversity and yield of cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) under the smallholder sectoren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2014-11-30en_US
dcterms.extent25-32en_US
cg.subject.agrovoccropsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation tillageen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmaizeen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccottonen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Pretoria - UPen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Zimbabwe - UoZen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2018-11-30en_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryZWen_US
cg.contactziramavunganidze@yahoo.co.uken_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.12.024en_US
cg.isijournalISI journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.652en_US
cg.journalCrop Protectionen_US
cg.volume58en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV