Show simple item record

dc.contributorLiesegang, Annetteen_US
dc.contributorLouhaichi, Mouniren_US
dc.contributorHilali, Muhi El-Dineen_US
dc.contributorRischkowsky, Barbaraen_US
dc.contributorKreuzer, Michaelen_US
dc.contributorMarquardt, Svenjaen_US
dc.creatorMeier, J.S.en_US
dc.date2014-02-28en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T00:18:00Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T00:18:00Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840113003106en_US
dc.identifier.citationJ. S. Meier, Annette Liesegang, Mounir Louhaichi, Muhi El-Dine Hilali, Barbara Rischkowsky, Michael Kreuzer, Svenja Marquardt. (28/2/2014). Intake pattern and nutrient supply of lactating sheep selecting dried forage from woody plants and straw offered in binary or multiple choice. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 188, pp. 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5443
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated whether offering either binary or multiple choice among low quality forages has an effect on intake and feeding behaviour compared to no-choice situations where only one single low-quality forage is offered. Forages from different woody plants and straw were tested in lactating sheep either in Syria (Exp. 1; Awassi sheep) or in Switzerland (Exp. 2; East Friesian Dairy sheep). Artemisia herba-alba, Atriplex leucoclada, Haloxylon articulatum, Noaea mucronata, and Salsola vermiculata were used in Exp. 1. The three most preferred plants (A. leucoclada, H. articulatum and S. vermiculata) were tested again in Exp. 2 together with Betula pendula, Castanea sativa and Juglans regia. Both experiments started with a binary choice test where one plant and barley straw were offered separately for 4 h in the morning to six sheep (test period) in a random sequence in consecutive 7-day subperiods. A control group (n = 6 per experiment) received only straw in the test period. For the rest of the day, a basal diet composed of straw ad libitum and concentrate was offered. After the binary choice test, two 2-week periods followed, where in the first straw only and in the second all test plants were offered to all animals from both groups to ascertain equal familiarisation with all plants. For the following 7-day multiple choice test animals were allocated to two new groups. The ‘multiple choice’ group could choose among all test plants and straw during the 4-h test period, the ‘control’ group received only the basal diet. Intakes of test feeds during 4 h and 24 h as well as feeding behaviour during the first 30 min were recorded. Additionally, nutrient intake was determined. Total daily test feed intake was always higher in the choice groups, but this was more pronounced in the multiple choice situation (Exp. 1: 30 and 48, Exp. 2: 49 and 74 g dry matter/kg live-weight0.75 with ‘control’ and ‘multiple choice’, respectively). A. leucoclada (Exp. 1; proportionately 0.73 of total test plant intake) and B. pendula (Exp. 2; 0.87) were the preferred plants in the multiple choice test and also with binary choice. Most other feeds were only consumed in low amounts in the binary and even less in multiple choice situations. In conclusion, giving sheep the choice among low quality forages seemed to be advantageous. Even though in both experiments animals preferred especially one plant, choice still facilitated intake.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAnimal Feed Science and Technology;188,(2013) Pagination 1,12en_US
dc.subjectchoiceen_US
dc.subjectfeed diversityen_US
dc.subjectsheep woodyen_US
dc.subjectplanten_US
dc.subjectintakeen_US
dc.titleIntake pattern and nutrient supply of lactating sheep selecting dried forage from woody plants and straw offered in binary or multiple choiceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idLouhaichi, Mounir: 0000-0002-4543-7631en_US
cg.creator.idHilali, Muhi El-Dine: 0000-0002-8945-9613en_US
cg.creator.idRischkowsky, Barbara: 0000-0002-0035-471Xen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivestocken_US
cg.subject.agrovocfeeding behaviouren_US
cg.contributor.centerSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich - ETH Zurichen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Zurich - UZHen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2113-11-15en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contactsvenja.marquardt@inw.agrl.ethz.chen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.11.003en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.755en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV