Show simple item record

dc.contributorSaid, Mohammeden_US
dc.contributorKifugo, Shemen_US
dc.contributorOgutu, Joseph O.en_US
dc.contributorOsano, Philip M.en_US
dc.contributorde Leeuw, Janen_US
dc.creatorde Leeuw, Joyce M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T18:21:20Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T18:21:20Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/f45GDmIQen_US
dc.identifier.citationJoyce M. de Leeuw, Mohammed Said, Shem Kifugo, Joseph O. Ogutu, Philip M. Osano, Jan de Leeuw. (30/6/2014). Spatial variation in the willingness to accept payment for conservation of a migratory wildlife corridor in the Athi-­‐Kaputiei Plains, Kenya. Ecosystem Services, 8, pp. 16-24.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5475
dc.description.abstractPayments for ecosystem services (PES) are increasingly being used as a tool to promote sustainable ecosystem services. The success of PES depends on the willingness of target landowners to accept the payments. In particular, to be effective in promoting the conservation of wide-­‐ranging migratory wildlife, the potential recipients of PES must be willing to accept the payments for ecosystem services along the entire migratory corridor to enable wildlife movements. This may be difficult and expensive to achieve where costs of providing the service vary along the corridor. This paper investigates spatial variation in willingness to accept payments (WTA) made by a Wildlife Conservation Lease Program in the Kitengela and Athi Kaputiei plains of Kenya. The program, designed as an incentive to keep land open for wildlife and livestock, currently (2012) offers land owners a flat fee of 10 US$ per ha per year, irrespective of location. We present a model relating WTA to distances to road infrastructure, towns and rivers, as well as to annual precipitation and slope. The model was implemented in GIS to display the spatial variation in the willingness of landowners to accept payments from the Wildlife Conservation Lease Program. The results reveal significant spatial variation in the willingness to accept payments for availing land for conservation, with higher willingness to accept payments concentrated away from roads and also in the south-­‐eastern section of the Kitengela plains. The results further suggest that the movements of wildlife will be blocked by lands currently not open to migration due to low WTA in the proximity of towns and tarmacked roads. An effective strategy to keep the land open for migratory wildlife should take the significant spatial variation in the willingness to 2 accept payment for land lease into account, and it is suggested to consider spatially stratifying the lease rates to reflect the underlying variation in WTA.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceEcosystem Services;8,(2014) Pagination 16,24en_US
dc.subjectwillingness to accept paymenten_US
dc.subjecthabitat connectivityen_US
dc.subjectmigration corridoren_US
dc.titleSpatial variation in the willingness to accept payment for conservation of a migratory wildlife corridor in the Athi-­‐Kaputiei Plains, Kenya.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2014-06-30en_US
dcterms.extent16-24en_US
cg.creator.idSaid, Mohammed: 0000-0001-8127-6399en_US
cg.creator.idOgutu, Joseph O.: 0000-0002-7379-0387en_US
cg.creator.idde Leeuw, Jan: 0000-0002-2005-4351en_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivestocken_US
cg.subject.agrovocpesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwildlife conservationen_US
cg.contributor.centerWageningen University & Research Centre - WURen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Hohenheimen_US
cg.contributor.centerMcGill Universityen_US
cg.contributor.centerWorld Agroforestry Center - ICRAFen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2018-06-30en_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKEen_US
cg.contactjoyce.deleeuw@wur.nlen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.01.003en_US
cg.isijournalISI journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor4.307en_US
cg.journalEcosystem Servicesen_US
cg.volume8en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV