Show simple item record

dc.contributorLohmann, Dirken_US
dc.contributorAzebaze, Nadegeen_US
dc.creatorFalk, Thomasen_US
dc.identifier.citationThomas Falk, Dirk Lohmann, Nadege Azebaze. (31/12/2016). Congruence of appropriation and provision in collective water provision in Central Namibia. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), pp. 71-118.en_US
dc.description.abstractAchieving cooperation in natural resource management is always a challenge when incentives exist for an individual to maximise her short term benefits at the cost of a group. We study a public good social dilemma in water infrastructure provision on land reform farms in Namibia. In the context of the Namibian land reform, arbitrarily mixed groups of livestock farmers have to share the operation and maintenance of water infrastructure. Typically, water is mainly used for livestock production, and livestock numbers are subject to high fluctuations due to the given environmental conditions. Our paper assesses how alternative payment systems with differing congruence of provision and appropriation support the cooperation in the group given the ever-changing equilibria. In a first step, we conducted an exploratory overview of the social-ecological system of central Namibian land reform projects. The Social Ecological System (SES) Framework served as a guideline for this assessment (Ostrom 2009). Taking the complexity of the cooperation situation into account, in the second step we designed a role-play that is based on a social-ecological simulation model. The role-play simulates the real-life decision situations of land reform beneficiaries wherein equilibria are permanently changing. This approach helped us to not only better understand the cooperation challenges of Namibian land reform beneficiaries, but also supported stakeholders in their decision making and institution building. Our study provides evidence to support that land reform beneficiaries increase their contributions as they own more livestock and as other group members increase their payments. Nevertheless, only groups with relatively homogeneous livestock endowments manage to agree on payment rules. Interestingly, the dominant rule is an “equal payment per farmer” and not a “payment per head of livestock”, though the latter would imply a higher congruence of provision and appropriation.en_US
dc.publisherUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Uopen Journals)en_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of the Commons;10,(2016) Pagination 71,118en_US
dc.subjectparticipatory ecological-economic modellingen_US
dc.subjectpublic gooden_US
dc.subjectrole playen_US
dc.subjectsavanna rangelanden_US
dc.titleCongruence of appropriation and provision in collective water provision in Central Namibiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.agrovocland reformen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Potsdamen_US
cg.contributor.centerPhilipps-Universität Marburgen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africaen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV