Show simple item record

dc.contributorManyawu, Godfreyen_US
dc.contributorMashanda, Promiseen_US
dc.contributorChakoma, Irenieen_US
dc.contributorMoyo, Sibonisoen_US
dc.contributorChakoma, Charlesen_US
dc.contributorSethaunyane, Hazelen_US
dc.contributorImbayarwo-Chikosi, Venancioen_US
dc.contributorDube, Sikhalazoen_US
dc.contributorMaasdorp, Barbaraen_US
dc.creatorGwiriri, Lovemoreen_US
dc.identifier.citationLovemore Gwiriri, Godfrey Manyawu, Promise Mashanda, Irenie Chakoma, Siboniso Moyo, Charles Chakoma, Hazel Sethaunyane, Venancio Imbayarwo-Chikosi, Sikhalazo Dube, Barbara Maasdorp. (22/7/2016). The potential of replacing conventional dairy supplements with forage legume-based diets in Zimbabwe’s smallholder dairy sector. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 33(3), pp. 155-163.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe effect of replacing commercial supplements with isoenergetic and isonitrogenous velvet bean-, cowpeaand lablab-based supplements on milk yield, milk quality and economic returns in smallholder crossbred dairy cows was investigated in the 2013 and 2014 dry seasons. Using 3 × 3 Latin square designs, nine multiparous Red Dane, Guernsey and Holstein-Friesian crosses in mid-lactation (130 ± 19 d) were offered forage legume-based supplements for 63 d at 0.5 kg per litre of milk produced. Milk quantity and quality were significantly (P < 0.05) different among supplements in both seasons. Cows fed commercial supplements had higher milk yield than cows fed forage legume supplements. Milk fat content was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in cows fed lablabbased supplements than cows fed other supplements. Milk protein, total solids and lactose content of cows fed commercial supplements was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those fed forage legume-based supplements, although protein content was similar to cows fed lablab-based supplements. Dietary gross margins were higher for cows fed velvet bean- and lablab-based supplements by 17% and 16.5%, respectively. Based on supplement, production costs per litre of milk was higher by 28% and 23% using commercial supplements compared to velvet bean and lablab supplements, respectively.en_US
dc.publisherNational Inquiry Services Centre (NISC)en_US
dc.sourceAfrican Journal of Range & Forage Science;33,(2016) Pagination 155,163en_US
dc.subjectsmallholder dairyen_US
dc.subjectforage legumesen_US
dc.titleThe potential of replacing conventional dairy supplements with forage legume-based diets in Zimbabwe’s smallholder dairy sectoren_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idChakoma, Irenie: 0000-0002-8224-4513en_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Zimbabwe - UoZen_US
cg.contributor.centerIndependent / Not associateden_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderAustralian Centre for International Agricultural Research - ACIARen_US
cg.contributor.projectZimCLIFS: Integrating crop and livestock production for improved food security and livelihoods in rural Zimbabween_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.isijournalISI journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
cg.journalAfrican Journal of Range & Forage Scienceen_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV