Show simple item record

dc.contributorVerma, Ajayen_US
dc.contributorVishnu, Kumaren_US
dc.contributorKharub, Ajit Singhen_US
dc.contributorSharma, Induen_US
dc.contributorSingh, Jogendraen_US
dc.creatorVerma, Ramesh Pal Singhen_US
dc.date2016-07-21en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-20T12:31:39Z
dc.date.available2017-02-20T12:31:39Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/BCjWJyL5en_US
dc.identifier.citationRamesh Pal Singh Verma, Ajay Verma, Kumar Vishnu, Ajit Singh Kharub, Indu Sharma, Jogendra Singh. (Accepted on 21/7/2016). G × E evaluation for feed barley genotypes evaluated in country by AMMI analysis. Journal of Applied and Natural Science.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5795
dc.description.abstractAMMI analysis of feed barley genotypes exhibited highly significant effects of environments, genotypes and interactions for both the years. The major portion of the total variance was described by the environmental effects up to 45.6% and 42.3% in respective years. The genotypes effects contributed marginally as of only 8.6% and 6.9% of total variation. The significant interaction effects were partitioned into IPCA1, IPCA2 , IPCA3 and IPCA4; which explained upto 42.4, 18.3, 9.7 and 8.1% of the first year and 32.2, 20.3, 15.6 and 10.5% for second year. The cumulative effect of first two interaction principal components comes out to 60.7% and 52.3% respectively. Maximum genotype yield during study period varied from 49.8 to 48 whereas the lowest yield ranged from 37 to 36.4 q/ ha. AMMI stability index identified genotypes G9(BH 972), G15(JB 274) for former and G23(DWRB 109) & G2(KB 1205) for latter year. AMMI distance marked G15(JB 274) & G7(NDB 1561) for first and genotypes G26(UPB 1034) & G23(DWRB 109) for the second year. Desirable genotypes for selection would be G11(PL 871), G27(PL 872) and G23(DWRB 109), G20(BH 946) for respective years a per the GSI score. Genotypes with IPCA-1 scores close to zero identified G1(PL 751), G9(BH 972) and G27(PL 872 ) for first year and G5(RD 2786), G4(NDB 1554) and G24 (UPB 1036) for second year would have wider adaptation to the tested environments as per AMMI graphical plots.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Applied and Natural Science;en_US
dc.subjectgxe interactionen_US
dc.subjectasven_US
dc.subjectbiplotsen_US
dc.subjectden_US
dc.subjectgsien_US
dc.subjectipcaen_US
dc.subjectmeten_US
dc.titleG × E evaluation for feed barley genotypes evaluated in country by AMMI analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idVerma, Ramesh Pal Singh: 0000-0002-2621-2015en_US
cg.subject.agrovocevaluationen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerIndian Council of Agricultural Research, Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research - ICAR-IIWBRen_US
cg.contributor.centerDirectorate of Wheat Research - DWRen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Cereals - DCen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contactverma.dwr@gmail.comen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.issn2231-5209en_US
cg.journalJournal of Applied and Natural Scienceen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV