Show simple item record

dc.contributorHaile, Aynalemen_US
dc.contributorWurzinger, Mariaen_US
dc.contributorRischkowsky, Barbaraen_US
dc.contributorGizaw Assefa, Solomonen_US
dc.contributorAtilaw, Abebeen_US
dc.contributorSölkner, Johannen_US
dc.creatorTilahun, Getachewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-06T03:49:25Z
dc.date.available2017-03-06T03:49:25Z
dc.identifierhttps://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-full-text/F20CAD857589en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/41yrdRPten_US
dc.identifier.citationGetachew Tilahun, Aynalem Haile, Maria Wurzinger, Barbara Rischkowsky, Solomon Gizaw Assefa, Abebe Atilaw, Johann Sölkner. (14/3/2016). Review of sheep crossbreeding based on exotic sires and among indigenous breeds in the tropics: An Ethiopian perspective. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11 (11), pp. 901-911.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/6278
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this review paper is to examine whether or not sheep crossbreeding is a feasible option to improve indigenous sheep breeds in developing countries using Ethiopian case as example. The paper reviewed and discussed the history of exotic breed introduction, research, and development efforts in crossbreeding and performance of crossbreds under on-station and on-farm management. Earlier, the choice of breed for crossbreeding overlooked interests and preferences of farmers mainly for physical appearance. More recently the introduction of Awassi sheep considered their preference. Performance evaluation results from the on-station and on-farm (mainly based on Awassi pilot crossbreeding villages) showed that crossbreds often outperformed their local contemporaries. Thus comparisons of pure local sheep and crossbreds among those breeds produced in some areas indicated a good outcome of this type of crossbreeding. However, the performance of crossbred sheep varied by location and depended on management and exotic inheritance levels. For most programs, no comprehensive data were available to do on-farm comparisons of herd productivity and cost-benefits or to evaluate the sustainability of the programs. Regardless of location, farmers participating in crossbreeding often showed keen interest in crossbreeding, mainly due to the fast growth, larger body size of crossbreds resulting in higher market prices as compared to their local sheep breeds. Ram multiplication and dissemination from the government farms were found inefficient. The predominant practice of a ubiquitous dissemination and selling of breeding rams to individual farmer dilute the efforts of crossbreeding and prevents generating the benefits expected from crossbreeding programs. Furthermore, indiscriminate crossbreeding without prior analysis of suitability of crossbreds for a given production environment and without clear breeding objectives presents a potential threat to better adapted indigenous breeds. Crossbreeding programs require strong research and development support from public service and non-governmental institutions for sustainable design, optimization, and implementation in clearly defined production environments.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research;11,(2016) Pagination 901-911en_US
dc.subjectawassien_US
dc.subjecton-farm performanceen_US
dc.titleReview of sheep crossbreeding based on exotic sires and among indigenous breeds in the tropics: An Ethiopian perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2016-03-14en_US
dcterms.extent901-911en_US
cg.creator.idHaile, Aynalem: 0000-0001-5914-0487en_US
cg.creator.idRischkowsky, Barbara: 0000-0002-0035-471Xen_US
cg.creator.idGizaw Assefa, Solomon: 0000-0002-7489-062Xen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdeveloping countriesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmallholder farmersen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdorperen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research - EIARen_US
cg.contributor.centerAmhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Gondar Agricultural Research Center - ARARI-GARCen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Natural Resources and LIfe Science - BOKUen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish - L&Fen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.projectCGIAR Research Program on Livestock & Fishen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryETen_US
cg.contacttilabungech@yahoo.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.10626en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.issn1991-637Xen_US
cg.journalAfrican Journal of Agricultural Researchen_US
cg.issue11en_US
cg.volume11en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV