Show simple item record

dc.contributorGetachew, Tesfayeen_US
dc.contributorRekik, Mouraden_US
dc.contributorRischkowsky, Barbaraen_US
dc.contributorAbate, Zelalemen_US
dc.contributorGoshme, Shenkuteen_US
dc.contributorWalle, Yeshiwasen_US
dc.contributorHaile, Aynalemen_US
dc.creatorMueller, Joaquínen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T18:32:46Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T18:32:46Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationJoaquín Mueller, Tesfaye Getachew, Mourad Rekik, Barbara Rischkowsky, Zelalem Abate, Shenkute Goshme, Yeshiwas Walle, Aynalem Haile. (1/11/2021). Three easy fixes for sire use can enhance genetic progress in community-based breeding programmes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 138 (6), pp. 719-730.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66406
dc.description.abstractWe analysed options to optimize the use of sires in sheep and goat community-based breeding programmes (CBBP) for three scenarios occurring under field conditions: premature sale of selection candidates, fixed service periods of selected sires and incomplete sire pedigrees. The first scenario was studied by looking at the outcome of combinations of selection pressures in successive selection stages. A compromise of early sale of sire candidates and genetic progress can be obtained by selecting in two stages, such that selection pressure in the first stage is chosen in terms of achieving an acceptable selection potential after the second stage. Simulations showed the dependency of this compromise on selection accuracies and correlation between selection criteria. For a typical sheep CBBP, only 20% of the top three months weighting male lambs need to be retained to achieve 80% of the potential selection differential on six months weight. For the second scenario, two alternatives to fixed service periods were analysed. When across-age BLUP EBVs are not available, individual sires can be programmed to stay in service according to their initial ranking. In typical sheep, CBBPs genetic progress can be increased by about 9% over response to selection with optimum fixed sire service periods. When BLUP EBVs are available, a simulated retrospective analyses of across-age selection of sires in two current sheep CBBPs increased more than twofold the average breeding values actually observed. Thirdly, we studied the benefit of considering possible sires and their mating probabilities when estimating BLUP breeding values instead of setting such sires as unknown. In a current goat CBBP with up to three possible sires included in the pedigree, the accuracy of breeding values nears the accuracy when sires are known and are higher than accuracies when sires are unknown or when possible sires are ignored.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Animal Breeding and Genetics;138,(2021) Pagination 719-730en_US
dc.subjectmulti-stage selectionen_US
dc.subjectuncertain pedigreeen_US
dc.titleThree easy fixes for sire use can enhance genetic progress in community-based breeding programmesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2021-11-01en_US
dcterms.extent719-730en_US
cg.creator.idGetachew, Tesfaye: 0000-0002-0544-6314en_US
cg.creator.idRekik, Mourad: 0000-0001-7455-2017en_US
cg.creator.idRischkowsky, Barbara: 0000-0002-0035-471Xen_US
cg.creator.idHaile, Aynalem: 0000-0001-5914-0487en_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmall ruminantsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocage structureen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccommunity-based breeding programmesen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Institute for Agricultural Technology - INTAen_US
cg.contributor.centerAmhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center - ARARI-DBARCen_US
cg.contributor.centerBonga Agricultural Research Center - BARCen_US
cg.contributor.centerSekota Dryland Agricultural Research Center - SDARCen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systems - Livestocken_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Livestock Research Institute - ILRIen_US
cg.contributor.projectCGIAR Research Program on Livestock Agri-Food Systemsen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryETen_US
cg.contactjoaquinmueller@gmail.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12639en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/237en_US
mel.impact-factor2.380en_US
cg.issn0931-2668en_US
cg.issn1439-0388en_US
cg.journalJournal of Animal Breeding and Geneticsen_US
cg.issue6en_US
cg.volume138en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV