Show simple item record

dc.contributorMartens, Joanne R. Thiessenen_US
dc.contributorBamford, Keith C.en_US
dc.contributorEntz, Martin H.en_US
dc.creatorCicek, Harunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-16T23:39:34Z
dc.date.available2021-12-16T23:39:34Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationHarun Cicek, Joanne R. Thiessen Martens, Keith C. Bamford, Martin H. Entz. (16/10/2014). Forage potential of six leguminous green manures and effect of grazing on following grain crops. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30 (6), pp. 503-514.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66617
dc.description.abstractThere is a need to design intensive cropping systems that can reap multiple benefits from annual forages including animal feed, soil fertility and weed control. Considering pea/oat (Pisum sativum cv. 40-10/Avena sativa cv. Legget) as a standard green manure, this study investigated the productivity, weed competitiveness, utilization and nitrogen (N) benefit from grazed and ungrazed green manures to spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Waskada) and fall rye (Secale cereale cv. Hazlet). A set of 3-year experiments was carried out in Carman, Manitoba, Canada in 2009, and was repeated in 2010 and 2011. Green manures were grazed by 2-3 ewes and 2-5 lambs for 24 h (1111-1667 sheep days per ha). Averaged over experiments pea/oat mix, hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis cv. Norgold) above-ground dry matter (DM) production were 5036, 5032 and 4064 kg ha(-1), respectively. Lentil (Lens culinaris cv. Indianhead), a mixture of seven species and soybean (Glycine max cv. Prudence) produced the least amount of DM over 3 years; 3589, 3551, 3174 kg ha(-1), respectively. Pea/oat and hairy vetch were the most weed-competitive species and, averaged over 3 years, contained less than 15% weed DM. Utilization of green manures by grazing animals varied little among species across years and ranged from 28 to 86% for individual species and years. When combined across experiments grazing increased N availability to the wheat crop. The grazing effect was significant for wheat DM production, N uptake and grain N, but not significant for yield across experiments. Averaged over 3 years, wheat took up 107 kg N ha(-1) from grazed plots versus 98 kg N ha(-1) from ungrazed plots. A significant speciesxmanagement interaction for total (wheat+fall rye) N uptake in 2009 indicated that increasing the proportion of legumes in the green manure increased N benefit from grazing. Fall rye productivity was not affected by grazing. We recommend pea/oat and hairy vetch as two green manure species to enhance the overall system performance to achieve high level of DM production, good weed competition, utilization by sheep and provision of N benefit to the following wheat and fall rye crops.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.sourceRenewable Agriculture and Food Systems;30,(2014) Pagination 503-514en_US
dc.subjectannual foragesen_US
dc.subjectField pea (Pisum sativum)en_US
dc.titleForage potential of six leguminous green manures and effect of grazing on following grain cropsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2014-10-16en_US
dcterms.extent503-514en_US
cg.subject.agrovocgrazingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocorganic agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgreen manuresen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccrop-livestock integrationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocOat (Avena sativa)en_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Manitobaen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Americaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCAen_US
cg.contactH.Cicek@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1742170514000349en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.657en_US
cg.issn1742-1705en_US
cg.issn1742-1713en_US
cg.journalRenewable Agriculture and Food Systemsen_US
cg.issue6en_US
cg.volume30en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV