Show simple item record

dc.contributorSingh, Yadvinderen_US
dc.contributorYigezu, Yigezuen_US
dc.contributorBashour, Isamen_US
dc.contributorMoussadek, Rachiden_US
dc.contributorMrabet, Rachiden_US
dc.creatorDevkota Wasti, Minaen_US
dc.date2021-12-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-30T14:07:37Z
dc.date.available2021-12-30T14:07:37Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationMina Devkota Wasti, Yadvinder Singh, Yigezu Yigezu, Isam Bashour, Rachid Moussadek, Rachid Mrabet. (10/12/2021). Conservation Agriculture in the Drylands of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: Past Trend, Current Opportunities, Challenges and Future Outlook. Advances in Agronomy, 172.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66826
dc.description.abstractConventional tillage coupled with monocropping and limited recycling of crop residues along with increased pressure from human and livestock population has led to the degradation of the soil, water resources, and the environment in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Conservation Agriculture (CA) considered as “climate-smart” agriculture, strives to achieve acceptable profits along with high and sustained production levels while concurrently conserving and regenerating soils and protecting the environment. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize available findings on CA, its past trends, current opportunities and challenges, evidence on potential benefits from its adaptation, to discuss its future outlook, and to make relevant recommendations for interventions and novel research needs for its wider diffusion in the region. In MENA, major research on CA has been mainly conducted in Morocco, Tunisia, Iran, and Syria, while Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt embarked CA research fairly recently. About 25–40% out of the 53 million hectares total arable land is estimated to be suitable for CA in the region. In recent years a growing number of studies carried under a range of climatic, soil, management and cropping conditions in many countries of MENA reported several benefits including higher and more stable yields and profits, reduced risks of crop loss, labor requirements, soil erosion, and improved soil moisture and quality under CA system. Despite its benefits, adoption of CA in MENA is still very low for various reasons including: lack of affordable and well-adapted seeders, the complexity of the CA system which posed a major challenge for mostly uneducated farmers to comprehend, ill-conceived policies that promote cereal intensification hence inadvertently promote monocropping, tradeoffs between residue retention and livestock feed, lack of adequate policy and institutional framework and incentives to enhance farmers’ adoption, and the private sector's active involvement in the dissemination of CA. The wider acceptance of CA requires the development of affordable and versatile no-till seeder alongside the implementation of integrated crop management practices. CA-based bundled agronomic management practices must be tailored to the biophysical and socio-economic environment. Finally, effective strategies for upscaling CA in MENA has to be developed by taking into consideration the unique features of the region. Despite the daunting past adoption trends and current challenges, we predict a bright future for CA in the region due to several factors including: rising energy prices and wage rates, the emergence of younger and more educated farmers, the advent of climate change, the increasing awareness on the degradation of land and water resources among farmers and policy makers, changes in dietary preferences subsequently increasing trends in demand and prices of legumes are expected to increase the desirability of CA and enhance its wider diffusion in MENA.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dc.sourceAdvances in Agronomy;172,(2021)en_US
dc.subjectcrop productivityen_US
dc.subjectcrop-residueen_US
dc.titleConservation Agriculture in the Drylands of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: Past Trend, Current Opportunities, Challenges and Future Outlooken_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idDevkota Wasti, Mina: 0000-0002-2348-4816en_US
cg.creator.idYigezu, Yigezu: 0000-0002-9156-7082en_US
cg.creator.idMrabet, Rachid: 0000-0003-0311-193Xen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdrylandsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsoil organic matteren_US
cg.subject.agrovoccrop-livestock integrationen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerPunjab Agricultural University - PAUen_US
cg.contributor.centerAmerican University of Beirut - AUBen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Institute of Agronomic Research Morocco - INRA Moroccoen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.projectCRP WHEAT Phase IIen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contactm.devkota@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.11.001en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor6.91en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV