Show simple item record

dc.contributorRyan, Johnen_US
dc.contributorSingh, Murarien_US
dc.contributorAtes, Serkanen_US
dc.contributorBahhady, Faiken_US
dc.contributorMohamed, Khalilen_US
dc.contributorYoussef, Omranen_US
dc.contributorLoss, Stephen Peteren_US
dc.creatorChristiansen, Scotten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-21T16:19:01Z
dc.date.available2017-06-21T16:19:01Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/hOoCJ1z6en_US
dc.identifier.citationScott Christiansen, John Ryan, Murari Singh, Serkan Ates, Faik Bahhady, Khalil Mohamed, Omran Youssef, Stephen Peter Loss. (6/3/2015). Potential legume alternatives to fallow and wheat monoculture for Mediterranean environments. Crop and Pasture Science, 66 (2), pp. 113-121.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7107
dc.description.abstractGrowing populations and intensification of land-use in West Asia and North Africa (WANA) are prompting a need for viable alternatives to fallow and cereal mono-cropping systems common in dry areas of this region. The sustainability and economic viability of such rotations can only be assessed accurately by using long-term trials.Atwo-course rotation experiment was established in 1986 in north-eastern Syria, comparing yields and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) when grown after wheat, fallow, a grazed mixture of medic species (Medicago spp.) and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) cut for hay, over 10 growing seasons. Lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.) were introduced into the experiment in 1990. On average over the course of the experiment, the highest wheat grain yields were obtained following fallow (2.57 t ha–1), the lowest in continuous wheat (1.14 t ha–1), and intermediate following medic and vetch (1.90–2.01 t ha–1). Compared with wheat grown after fallow, wheat grain yields declined following vetch, medic and lentils in only three of the 10 seasons, which were drier than average. Yields of wheat after lentils were generally lower (2.22 t ha–1) than after vetch (mean 2.56 t ha–1) and after medic (2.40 t ha–1). Inclusion of grain legumes in the rotations boosted profits considerably because of their high grain prices and valuable straw. Replacing fallow with vetch for hay production increased the average gross margin by US$126 ha–1 year–1, and growing vetch for hay in rotation with wheat produced greater profit than continuous wheat, by $254 ha–1 year–1. The wheat–vetch-for-grain and wheat–lentil rotations were especially profitable, at least twice as profitable as wheat–fallow and three times continuous wheat. This experiment adds to the growing body of field data in Syria and in Australia showing that forage and grain legumes are excellent alternatives to wheat–fallow rotation and continuous wheat production in areas that experience a Mediterranean-type climate, and help support more efficient and sustainable cropping systems.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceCrop and Pasture Science;66,(2015) Pagination 113-121en_US
dc.subjectfertilisationen_US
dc.subjectmediterranean production systemsen_US
dc.subjectrainfed cereal croppingen_US
dc.titlePotential legume alternatives to fallow and wheat monoculture for Mediterranean environmentsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-03-06en_US
dcterms.extent113-121en_US
cg.creator.idSingh, Murari: 0000-0001-5450-0949en_US
cg.creator.idAtes, Serkan: 0000-0001-6825-3248en_US
cg.subject.agrovocnitrogenen_US
cg.subject.agrovocforage legumesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsustainable land useen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocLegumeen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUnited States Agency for International Development - USAIDen_US
cg.contributor.centerGeneral Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research - GCSARen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes - GLen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectBiometrics and Statistics Sectionen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contacts.ates@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP14063en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/102en_US
mel.impact-factor1.488en_US
cg.issn1836-0947en_US
cg.journalCrop and Pasture Scienceen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.volume66en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV