Show simple item record

dc.contributorBruggeman, Adrianaen_US
dc.contributorAkhoond-Ali, A.en_US
dc.contributorOweis, Theiben_US
dc.contributorAbbasi, Fariborzen_US
dc.creatorHessari, Behzaden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-23T21:56:17Z
dc.date.available2017-07-23T21:56:17Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/20/1903/2016/en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/303037422_Supplemental_irrigation_potential_and_impact_on_downstream_flow_of_Karkheh_River_basin_in_Iranen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/CBLiehNAen_US
dc.identifier.citationBehzad Hessari, Adriana Bruggeman, A. Akhoond-Ali, Theib Oweis, Fariborz Abbasi. (12/5/2016). Supplemental irrigation potential and impact on downstream flow of Karkheh River Basin of Iran. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 20, pp. 1903-1910.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7180
dc.description.abstractSupplemental irrigation of rainfed winter crops improves and stabilizes crop yield and water productivity. Although yield increases by supplemental irrigation are well established at the field level, its potential extent and impact on water resources at the basin level are less researched. This work presents a GIS-based methodology for identifying areas that are potentially suitable for supplemental irrigation and a computer routine for allocating stream flow for supplemental irrigation in different subbasins. A case study is presented for the 42 908 km<sup>2</sup> upper Karkheh River Basin (KRB) in Iran, which has 15 840 km<sup>2</sup> of rainfed crop areas. Rainfed crop areas within 1 km from the streams, with slope classes 0–5%, 0–8%, 0–12% and 0–20%, were assumed to be suitable for supplemental irrigation. Four stream flow conditions (normal, normal with environmental flow requirements, drought and drought with environmental flow) were considered for the allocation of water resources. Thirty-seven percent (5801 km<sup>2</sup>) of the rainfed croplands had slopes less than 5%. Sixty-one percent (3559 km<sup>2</sup>) of this land was suitable for supplemental irrigation, but only 22% (1278 km<sup>2</sup>) could be served with irrigation in both fall (75 mm) and spring (100 mm), under normal flow conditions. If irrigation would be allocated to all suitable land with slopes up to 20%, 2057 km<sup>2</sup> could be irrigated. This would reduce the average annual outflow of the upper KRB by 9%. If environmental flow requirements are considered, a maximum (0–20% slopes) of 1444 km<sup>2</sup> could receive supplemental irrigation. Under drought conditions a maximum of 1013 km<sup>2</sup> could be irrigated, while the outflow would again be reduced by 9%. Thus, the withdrawal of steam flow for supplemental irrigation has relatively little effect on the outflow of the upper KRB. However, if the main policy goal would be to improve rainfed areas throughout the upper KRB, options for storing surface water need to be developed.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Union (EGU)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceHydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions;20,(2016) Pagination 1903-1910en_US
dc.subjectdown streamen_US
dc.subjectkarkheh basinen_US
dc.titleSupplemental irrigation potential and impact on downstream flow of Karkheh River Basin of Iranen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2016-05-12en_US
dcterms.extent1903-1910en_US
cg.creator.idOweis, Theib: 0000-0002-2003-4852en_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsupplemental irrigationen_US
cg.subject.agrovociran islamic republicen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerAgricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (Agricultural Extension, Education and Research Organization) - AREEO (AEERO)en_US
cg.contributor.centerThe Cyprus Institute - CYIen_US
cg.contributor.centerShahid Chamran University of Ahvazen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems - WLEen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryIRen_US
cg.contacthessari@yahoo.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1903-2016en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor4.437en_US
cg.issn1812-2108en_US
cg.journalHydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussionsen_US
cg.volume20en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV