Show simple item record

dc.contributorOweis, Theiben_US
dc.creatorKarrou, Mohammeden_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-23T21:58:37Z
dc.date.available2017-07-23T21:58:37Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377412000303en_US
dc.identifier.citationMohammed Karrou, Theib Oweis. (1/5/2012). Water and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management, 107, pp. 94-103.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7183
dc.description.abstractSelecting appropriate crops and applying deficit irrigation can help increase water productivity in waterlimited regions such as the Mediterranean. The objective of this study was to develop water production functions of major cereal and legume crops under the same environmental and management conditions. Bread and durum wheat, faba bean, chickpea, and lentil were grown under full supplemental irrigation (FSI), two deficit irrigations levels of 2/3 of FSI (2/3SI) and 1/3 of FSI (1/3SI), and under rainfed conditions (no irrigation). In average, the actual evapotranspirations (ETs) under FSI were 549, 552, 365, 451 and 297 mm, for bread wheat, durum wheat, faba bean, chickpea and lentil, respectively. For the same crops, they were 463, 458, 330, 393 and 277 mm for the treatment 2/3SI and 357, 351, 265, 318 and 244 mm for the treatment 1/3SI, respectively. In the case of the rainfed treatment, ETs for the mentioned crops were 250, 251, 227, 237 and 215 mm, respectively. The experiment was conducted at the ICARDA experimental station at Tel Hadya, near Aleppo, Syria, over three growing seasons from 2007 to 2010. Results showed that, in general, the treatment with 1/3 of FSI gave the highest rate of increase in grain yield and water productivity. The mean grain yield from rainfed, 1/3SI, 2/3SI, and FSI were 1.36, 3.82, 5.18, and 5.70 t/ha for bread wheat; 1.24, 3.80, 5.10, and 5.75 t/ha for durum wheat; 1.57, 2.35, 2.86, and 3.54 t/ha for faba bean, 1.36, 2.63, 3.36, and 3.74 t/ha for chickpea, and 0.64, 1.16, 1.42, and 1.58 t/ha for lentil respectively. Grain yield reductions due to the application of 2/3SI were around 10, 5, 15.6, and 10.2% of FSI on average for wheat, chickpea, faba bean, and lentils, respectively. Deficit irrigation at 2/3SI increased water productivity compared to rainfed treatments, by 200, 223, 126, 148 and 190% for bread wheat, durum wheat, faba bean, chickpea, and lentils, respectively. However, differences in total water productivity of crops grown under full irrigation compared to deficit irrigation were not significant. Irrigation water productivity ranged from 25 kg ha−1mm−1 in wheat with 1/3SI to 10 kg ha−1mm−1 for legumes under the FSI treatment. Unlike legumes, maximizing wheat grain yield caused a decline in water productivity.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management;107,(2012) Pagination 94-103en_US
dc.subjectfaba beanen_US
dc.subjectyielden_US
dc.titleWater and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environmenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2012-02-16en_US
dcterms.extent94-103en_US
dcterms.issued2012-05-01en_US
cg.creator.idOweis, Theib: 0000-0002-2003-4852en_US
cg.subject.agrovocwheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocsyriaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocevapotranspirationen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclentilsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdeficit irrigationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.subject.agrovocFaba beanen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocLentilen_US
cg.subject.agrovocChickpeaen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems - WLEen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2112-02-11en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contactm.karrou@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.01.014en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.848en_US
cg.issn0378-3774en_US
cg.journalAgricultural Water Managementen_US
cg.volume107en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV