Show simple item record

dc.contributorDhehibi, Boubakeren_US
dc.contributorMazid, Ahmeden_US
dc.contributorHussein, Abdalraheem A.en_US
dc.contributorAw-Hassan, Aden A.en_US
dc.creatorFageer, Elrashid A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-23T22:04:22Z
dc.date.available2017-07-23T22:04:22Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.idosi.org/aejaes/jaes13(8)13/14.pdfen_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/259934299_The_Impacts_of_an_Improved_Technology_Package_on_Production_Efficiency_The_Case_of_Wheat_Farms_in_the_Northern_State_of_Sudanen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/ZoWWmue6en_US
dc.identifier.citationElrashid A. Fageer, Boubaker Dhehibi, Ahmed Mazid, Abdalraheem A. Hussein, Aden A. Aw-Hassan. (25/11/2013). The Impacts of an Improved Technology Package on Production Efficiency: The Case of Wheat Farms in the Northern State of Sudan. American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences, 13 (8), pp. 1114-1123.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7189
dc.description.abstractTechnical efficiency among wheat farms in the Northern State of Sudan was estimated using a stochastic frontier production function approach. Empirical findings show that technical inefficiency is important in explaining the variations in yield among a sample of 100 wheat farms. Specifically, there was an average yield difference of 23% that can be bridged in the short-run only by removing the causes of inefficiency among farms. Average technical efficiency among improved technology package adopters is 94%, which is quite higher than the 67% of non-adopters. Technical efficiency was 96% for participant farmers and 72% for non-participant farmers in the ‘Enhancing Food Security in Arab Countries’ project. The average yield losses because of inefficiency are 0.5 ton ha 1 for adopters and 3.8 ton ha 1 for non-adopters. Proper extension services, farmer training and availability of finance are the most significant factors that affect technical efficiency in the study area. At the current levels of input use, an average loss of about 1.47 ton ha 1 could be prevented by improving the extension services and technology transfer activities. These results have important policy and institutional implications for governments, non-governmental organizations and extension agents working in the area as it could guide their decisions and areas of focus in the future.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Digital Organization for Scientific Information - IDOSIen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAmerican-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences;13,(2013) Pagination 1114-1123en_US
dc.subjectnorthern state of sudanen_US
dc.subjectstochastic frontier production functionen_US
dc.subjecttechnical efficiencyen_US
dc.titleThe Impacts of an Improved Technology Package on Production Efficiency: The Case of Wheat Farms in the Northern State of Sudanen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2013-11-25en_US
dcterms.extent1114-1123en_US
cg.creator.idDhehibi, Boubaker: 0000-0003-3854-6669en_US
cg.creator.idAw-Hassan, Aden A.: 0000-0002-9236-4949en_US
cg.subject.agrovocwheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovoccobb-douglas functionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerAgricultural Research Corporation - ARC Sudanen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySDen_US
cg.contactB.Dhehibi@cgiar.orgen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.issn1818-6769en_US
cg.journalAmerican-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciencesen_US
cg.issue8en_US
cg.volume13en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV