Show simple item record

dc.contributorMartens, Joanne R. Thiessenen_US
dc.contributorBamford, Keith C.en_US
dc.contributorEntz, Martin H.en_US
dc.creatorCicek, Harunen_US
dc.date2013-10-29en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-24T00:38:43Z
dc.date.available2017-07-24T00:38:43Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationHarun Cicek, Joanne R. Thiessen Martens, Keith C. Bamford, Martin H. Entz. (29/10/2013). Effects of grazing two green manure crop types in organic farmingsystems: N supply and productivity of following grain crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 190, pp. 27-37.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7276
dc.description.abstractGrazing green manures may improve N availability and productivity in integrated crop–livestock systems. We hypothesized that grazing green manures, compared with standard soil incorporation with tillage, would increase autumn soil profile NO3–N concentrations and grain yields in subsequent years. Three multiyear experiments were carried out for three years between 2009 and 2011 in Manitoba, Canada. For all three experiments, spring-seeded oat (Avena sativa cv. Leggett) and pea/oat (A. sativa/Pisum sativum cv. 40-10) green manure crops were grazed with sheep or left ungrazed in year one. Both treatments were soil incorporated with a tandem disk after grazing. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Waskada) and fall rye (Secale cereale cv. Hazlet) test crops were grown in the second and third years, respectively. Biomass production was greater for pea/oat than oat in experiment 1; in experiment 2 pea/oat = oat; and in experiment 3 pea/oat < oat. Grazing utilization of green manure biomass averaged 62% across all treatments and experiments with no utilization differences between crop species. On average, less than 10% of biomass consisted of weeds for both green manures. Soil NO3–N to 120 cm was significantly greater in grazed than in ungrazed plots; however soil P and K were unaffected. Nitrate content was greater in pea/oat mixture plots for all three experiments at 0–120 cm than oat plots. The absence of a significant management × green manure type interaction indicated that both crop types responded similarly to grazing. Greater availability of soil NO3–N after grazing translated into significantly greater crop growth and N uptake in some years, although significant increases in yield of following crops were not observed. Importantly, grazing green manures never negatively affected wheat or rye yield. In conclusion, grazing green manure crops increased N supply for subsequent crop production with no negative yield effects on two subsequent grain crops.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment;190,(2013) Pagination 27,37en_US
dc.subjectcrop–livestocken_US
dc.subjectannual foragesen_US
dc.titleEffects of grazing two green manure crop types in organic farmingsystems: N supply and productivity of following grain cropsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdiversificationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocintegrationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgrazingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocorganic agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgreen manuresen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Manitobaen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2113-09-29en_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Americaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCAen_US
cg.contactH.Cicek@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.028en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor4.099en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV