Show simple item record

dc.contributorShideed, Kamelen_US
dc.contributorAmri, Ahmeden_US
dc.creatorMazid, Ahmeden_US
dc.date2014-12-31en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-24T00:40:19Z
dc.date.available2017-07-24T00:40:19Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems/article/assessment-of-on-farm-conservation-of-dryland-agrobiodiversity-and-its-impact-on-rural-livelihoods-in-the-fertile-crescent/F8EE8A1BBB1AD5A05728F8E0E0155C35en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/259934542_Assessment_of_on-farm_conservation_of_dryland_agrobiodiversity_and_its_impact_on_rural_livelihoods_in_the_Fertile_Crescenten_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/xnDWv9Onen_US
dc.identifier.citationAhmed Mazid, Kamel Shideed, Ahmed Amri. (31/12/2014). Assessment of on-farm conservation of dryland agrobiodiversity and its impact on rural livelihoods in the Fertile Crescent. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 29 (4), pp. 366-377.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7277
dc.description.abstractThe Fertile Crescent encompasses a mega-center of diversity of crops and livestock of global importance. The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) coordinated a 5-year regional project funded by the Global Environment Facility to promote in situ conservation of dryland agrobiodiversity in Jordan, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority and Syria. The project focused on conserving landraces and wild relatives of Allium, Vicia, Trifolium, Medicago and Lathyrus spp. and barley, wheat, lentil and dryland fruit trees (olive, prune, pear, pistachio, almond, cherry and apricot). ICARDA and national programs assessed the status and importance of local agrobiodiversity by surveying 570 farm households in the project target areas including the characterization of their livelihood strategies, agrobiodiversity use and household income sources. A wealth index was created considering human, natural, financial, physical and social assets and was used to classify households into four wealth quartiles. The results indicated that agriculture and agrobiodiversity continue to be important for supporting the livelihoods of poor communities in dry and mountainous regions. The poorest households obtained their income from diverse sources including crop production, off-farm labor and government employment. However, households in the highest wealth grouping are mainly dependent on income from selling livestock products and live animals. They also practiced crop production, worked off-farm and took advantage of government employment. Off-farm income was important for livelihoods in all areas, representing 43–68% of household incomes. For all groups, fruit trees were generally more important than field crops for income generation, mainly in mountainous areas. The finding of this study showed that all farmers’ groups contribute greatly to on-farm conservation of landraces, with a bigger role for poor farmers in conserving the landraces of fruit trees. Diversification of income and farming systems to include livestock, field crops and fruit trees along with off-farm activities are contributing to the conservation of agrobiodiversity in these marginal environments. Several opportunities for income increase and diversification through add-value activities and alternative sources of income are demonstrated to the custodians of dryland agrobiodiversity. Their benefits can contribute to the sustainability of agrobiodiversity conservation, provided that marketing of local products can be enhanced.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP): STM Journalsen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceRenewable Agriculture and Food Systems;29,(2013) Pagination 366,377en_US
dc.subjectin situ conservationen_US
dc.subjectdryland agrobiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectlivelihood analysisen_US
dc.subjectfertile crescenten_US
dc.subjectBarleyen_US
dc.subjectWheaten_US
dc.subjectLentilen_US
dc.titleAssessment of on-farm conservation of dryland agrobiodiversity and its impact on rural livelihoods in the Fertile Crescenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idShideed, Kamel: 0000-0002-2822-1097en_US
cg.creator.idAmri, Ahmed: 0000-0003-0997-0276en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclandracesen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryJOen_US
cg.coverage.countryLBen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.coverage.countryPSen_US
cg.contacta.mazid@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000240en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.333en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV