Show simple item record

dc.contributorGoyal, Aakashen_US
dc.contributorChitgupekar, Satish S.en_US
dc.contributorAgrawal, Shiv Kumaren_US
dc.contributorEl Bouhssini, Mustaphaen_US
dc.creatorPatil, Somanagoudaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T14:53:48Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T14:53:48Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-017-0428-8en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/317414850_Sustainable_management_of_chickpea_pod_borer_A_reviewen_US
dc.identifier.citationSomanagouda Patil, Aakash Goyal, Satish S. Chitgupekar, Shiv Kumar Agrawal, Mustapha El Bouhssini. (30/6/2017). Sustainable management of chickpea pod borer. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37: 20.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7480
dc.description.abstractThe pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)] is responsible for causing up to 90% damage in chickpea due to its regular occurrence from the vegetative growth to the pod formation stage. In order to manage this problem, growers are tempted to increase the amounts of pesticides, but indiscriminate or injudicious use of pesticides has resulted in residues in the food chain, pesticide resistance, and pest resurgence, in addition to causing harm to non-targeted beneficial organisms and the environment. Here, we reviewed the sustainable approaches to reduce the incidence of pod borer and achieve sustainability in chickpea production systems through the adoption of an integrated approach involving host plant resistance, good agronomic practices, and judicious use of chemical and biological methods. We found that the following major points have been reported to reduce the survival and damage of pod borer: (1) use of resistant varieties (the cheapest and the best method of pod borer management); (2) implementing a number of good agronomic practices, such as early sowing with optimum planting density and fertilizer levels, including inter/trap crops (coriander, mustard, linseed, sunflower, sorghum, and marigold) and installing animated bird perches and T-perches at 2 m distance of predatory zones; and (3) monitoring pod borer through pheromone traps (which is also necessary to understand the major factors influencing pest population and to make the pest control program more effective). Integrating all of these approaches with biological control has shown some encouraging results for sustainable pod borer management and has resulted in high chickpea yields. This review highlights examples of successful management approaches from past studies that were implemented in experimental and farmers’ fields. These approaches can be explored as reproducible practices for managing the pest in locations with similar H. armigera concerns. We conclude that an integrated approach is most effective for long-term sustainable management programs.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)en_US
dc.sourceAgronomy for Sustainable Development;37:20,(2017)en_US
dc.subjectpod boreren_US
dc.subjectgood agronomic practicesen_US
dc.subjectbreeding for resistanceen_US
dc.subjectsustainable managementen_US
dc.titleSustainable management of chickpea pod borer. A reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2017-06-02en_US
dcterms.issued2017-06-30en_US
cg.creator.idAgrawal, Shiv Kumar: 0000-0001-8407-3562en_US
cg.creator.idEl Bouhssini, Mustapha: 0000-0001-8945-3126en_US
cg.subject.agrovochelicoverpa armigeraen_US
cg.subject.agrovocipmen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.subject.agrovocChickpeaen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore - UAS Bangaloreen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes - GLen_US
cg.contributor.funderArab Fund for Economic and Social Development - AFESDen_US
cg.contributor.projectSustainability and Operation of the Regional Research Centers in a Number of Arab Countries (Phase II)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2117-06-02en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Europeen_US
cg.coverage.countryBJen_US
cg.coverage.countryBFen_US
cg.coverage.countryMAen_US
cg.coverage.countryNEen_US
cg.coverage.countryIOen_US
cg.contactakgroyal@gmail.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0428-8en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/216en_US
mel.impact-factor4.101en_US
cg.issn1774-0746en_US
cg.journalAgronomy for Sustainable Developmenten_US
cg.volume37:20en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV