Show simple item record

dc.contributorFarahani, Hamiden_US
dc.contributorHachum, Ahmeden_US
dc.creatorOweis, Theiben_US
dc.date2011-05-30en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-04T10:58:58Z
dc.date.available2018-03-04T10:58:58Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377411000424en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/227411426_Evapotranspiration_and_water_use_of_full_and_deficit_irrigated_cotton_in_the_Mediterranean_environment_in_northern_Syriaen_US
dc.identifier.citationTheib Oweis, Hamid Farahani, Ahmed Hachum. (30/5/2011). Evapotranspiration and water use of full and deficit irrigated cotton in the Mediterranean environment in northern Syria. Agricultural Water Management, 98 (8), pp. 1239-1248.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7970
dc.description.abstractCotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the most important industrial and summer cash crop in Syria and many other countries in the arid areas but there are concerns about future production levels, given the high water requirements and the decline in water availability. Most farmers in Syria aim to maximize yield per unit of land regardless of the quantity of water applied. Water losses can be reduced and water productivity (yield per unit of water consumed) improved by applying deficit irrigation, but this requires a better understanding of crop response to various levels of water stress. This paper presents results from a 3-year study (2004–2006) conducted in northern Syria to quantify cotton yield response to different levels of water and fertilizer. The experiment included four irrigation levels and three levels of nitrogen (N) fertilizer under drip irrigation. The overall mean cotton (lint plus seed, or lintseed) yield was 2502 kg ha−1, ranging from 1520 kg ha−1 under 40% irrigation to 3460 kg ha−1 under 100% irrigation. Mean water productivity (WPET) was 0.36 kg lintseed per m3 of crop actual evapotranspiration (ETc), ranging from 0.32 kg m−3 under 40% irrigation to 0.39 kg m−3 under the 100% treatment. Results suggest that deficit irrigation does not improve biological water productivity of drip-irrigated cotton. Water and fertilizer levels (especially the former) have significant effects on yield, crop growth and WPET. Water, but not N level, has a highly significant effect on crop ETc. The study provides production functions relating cotton yield to ETc as well as soil water content at planting. These functions are useful for irrigation optimization and for forecasting the impact of water rationing and drought on regional water budgets and agricultural economies. The WPET values obtained in this study compare well with those reported from the southwestern USA, Argentina and other developed cotton producing regions. Most importantly, these WPET values are double the current values in Syria, suggesting that improved irrigation water and system management can improve WPET, and thus enhance conservation and sustainability in this water-scarce region.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management;98,(2011) Pagination 1239,1248en_US
dc.subjectnitrogen applicationen_US
dc.titleEvapotranspiration and water use of full and deficit irrigated cotton in the Mediterranean environment in northern Syriaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idOweis, Theib: 0000-0002-2003-4852en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocproduction functionsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdrip irrigationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater productivityen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service - USDA - NRCS Raleighen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Mosulen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems - WLEen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2111-04-15en_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.contacttheib.y.oweis@gmail.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.02.009en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.848en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV