Show simple item record

dc.contributorAzizi, Abdul Ghafooren_US
dc.contributorOwens, Garyen_US
dc.contributorQadir, Manzooren_US
dc.contributorKahlon, UZen_US
dc.creatorMurtaza, Ghulamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-11T07:36:11Z
dc.date.available2018-03-11T07:36:11Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationGhulam Murtaza, Abdul Ghafoor Azizi, Gary Owens, Manzoor Qadir, UZ Kahlon. (1/4/2009). Environmental and Economic Benefits of Saline-Sodic Soil Reclamation Using Low-quality Water and Soil Amendments in Conjunction with a Rice–Wheat Cropping System. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195 (2), pp. 124-136.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/8044
dc.description.abstractA combination of appropriate crop rotation(s) and management interventions has the potential to transform saline-sodic soil and water resources from an environmental burden into an economic asset. We carried out 2-year field studies in the Indus Basin of Pakistan to evaluate different irrigation and soil management options of using saline-sodic waters (SSW) and soils for reclamation and for growing salt-tolerant cultivars of rice (SSRI-8) and wheat (SIS-32). These soils have variable levels of salinity and sodicity (ECe 9–44 dS m−1 and SAR 83–319). The treatments on both the sites were the same and consisted of: (1) Irrigation with SSW, (2) Irrigation with freshwater (FW), (3) Soil application of gypsum at 100 % gypsum requirement of soil + SSW (G + SSW), (4) G + one irrigation with SSW and one with FW (G + 1SSW + 1FW), (5) G + two irrigations with SSW and one with FW (G + 2SSW + 1FW), (6) Farm manure at 25 Mg ha−1 each year before rice + one irrigation with SSW and one with FW (FM + 1SSW + 1FW) and (7) FM + two irrigations with SSW and one with FW (FM + 2SSW + 1FW). Rice was grown as the first crop. After harvesting final wheat crop (fourth in sequence), maximum decrease in bulk density and increase in infiltration rate was observed with G + 1SSW + 1FW while FM + 1SSW + 1FW treatment showed higher decrease in pHs and ECe. Significantly the highest decrease in SAR occurred at both sites with G + 1SSW + 1FW. Maximum yields of rice and wheat were generally observed with G + 1SSW + 1FW. The crop yield and economic benefits with treatments showed a positive correlation with that of improvement in soil physical and chemical properties. Overall, the greatest net benefit was obtained from G + 1SSW + 1FW treatment. We also found that the farmers’ management skills were crucial in the overall success in improving crop yields during reclamation of saline-sodic soils. Based on the results of this study, we propose that SSW could be used to reclaim saline-sodic soils by using a rice–wheat rotation and a site-specific combination of soil amendments and water application strategies.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley: 12 monthsen_US
dc.sourcejournal of agronomy and crop science;195,(2009) Pagination 124-136en_US
dc.subjectlow-quality wateren_US
dc.subjectsaline-sodic soilen_US
dc.subjectsoil amendmenten_US
dc.titleEnvironmental and Economic Benefits of Saline-Sodic Soil Reclamation Using Low-quality Water and Soil Amendments in Conjunction with a Rice–Wheat Cropping Systemen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2009-03-04en_US
dcterms.extent124-136en_US
dcterms.issued2009-04-01en_US
cg.subject.agrovocreclamationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocRiceen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of South Australiaen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Agriculture, Faisalabad - UAFen_US
cg.contributor.centerAfghan Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock - MAILen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2109-03-04en_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryPKen_US
cg.contactgmurtazauaf@gmail.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00350.xen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor2.727en_US
cg.issn0931-2250en_US
cg.journaljournal of agronomy and crop scienceen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.volume195en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV