Show simple item record

dc.contributorSommer, Rolfen_US
dc.contributorShirokova, Y. I.en_US
dc.contributorLamers, Johannesen_US
dc.contributorKienzler, Kirsten M.en_US
dc.contributorTischbein, Bernharden_US
dc.contributorMartius, Christopheren_US
dc.contributorVlek, Paulen_US
dc.creatorForkutsa, Irinaen_US
dc.date2009-05-30en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T00:13:28Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T00:13:28Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00271-009-0148-1en_US
dc.identifier.citationIrina Forkutsa, Rolf Sommer, Y. I. Shirokova, Johannes Lamers, Kirsten M. Kienzler, Bernhard Tischbein, Christopher Martius, Paul Vlek. (30/5/2009). Modeling irrigated cotton with shallow groundwater in the Aral Sea Basin of Uzbekistan: I. Water dynamics. Irrigation Science, 27 (4), pp. 331-346.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/8407
dc.description.abstractIn Khorezm, a region located in the Aral Sea basin of Uzbekistan, water use for irrigation of predominantly cotton is high whereas water use efficiency is low. To quantify the seasonal water and salt balance, water application, crop growth, soil water, and groundwater dynamics were studied on a sandy, sandy loam and loamy cotton field in the years 2003 and 2005. To simulate and quantify improved management strategies and update irrigation standards, the soil water model Hydrus-1D was applied. Results showed that shallow groundwater contributed a substantial share (up to 399 mm) to actual evapotranspiration of cotton (estimated at 488–727 mm), which alleviated water stress in response to suboptimal quantities of water applied for irrigation, but enhanced concurrently secondary soil salinization. Thus, pre-season salt leaching becomes a necessity. Nevertheless, as long as farmers face high uncertainty in irrigation water supply, maintaining shallow groundwater tables can be considered as a safety-net against unreliable water delivery. Simulations showed that in 2003 around 200 mm would have been sufficient during pre-season leaching, whereas up to 300 mm of water was applied in reality amounting to an overuse of almost 33%. Using some of this water during the irrigation season would have alleviated season crop-water stress such as in June 2003. Management strategy analyses revealed that crop water uptake would only marginally benefit from a permanent crop residue layer, often recommended as part of conservation agriculture. Such a mulch layer, however, would substantially reduce soil evaporation, capillary rise of groundwater, and consequently secondary soil salinization. The simulations furthermore demonstrated that not relying on the contribution of shallow groundwater to satisfy crop water demand is possible by implementing timely and soil-specific irrigation scheduling. Water use would then not be higher than the current Uzbek irrigation standards. It is argued that if furrow irrigation is to be continued, pure sandy soils, which constitute <5% of the agricultural soils in Khorezm, are best to be taken out of annual cotton production.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceIrrigation Science;27,(2009) Pagination 331,346en_US
dc.subjectshallow groundwateren_US
dc.subjectpressure headen_US
dc.subjectirrigation eventen_US
dc.subjectCottonen_US
dc.titleModeling irrigated cotton with shallow groundwater in the Aral Sea Basin of Uzbekistan: I. Water dynamicsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idSommer, Rolf: 0000-0001-7599-9056en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocirrigation wateren_US
cg.contributor.centerJustus Liebig University Giessen - JLUen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerCentral Asian Irrigation Research Institute - SANIIRIen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Bonn - Uni-Bonnen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionCentral Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUZen_US
cg.contactr.sommer@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0148-1en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.impact-factor1.653en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV