Show simple item record

dc.contributorBarnett, Chrisen_US
dc.contributorPonsford, Richarden_US
dc.creatorJacobs, Alexen_US
dc.date2010-11-17en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T00:28:52Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T00:28:52Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationAlex Jacobs, Chris Barnett, Richard Ponsford. (17/11/2010). Three Approaches to Monitoring: Feedback Systems, Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation and Logical Frameworks. IDS bulletin, 41(6), pp. 36-44.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9494
dc.description.abstractThis article compares key attributes, strengths and weaknesses of three different approaches to monitoring development interventions: the logical framework approach, participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) and feedback systems. Academic and practitioner literature describes how logframes meet the needs of senior decision‐makers to summarise, organise and compare projects. PM&E meets the needs of field staff to work sensitively with intended beneficiaries and support their learning and empowerment. Feedback systems appear to link the two, providing performance data for managers and creating incentives for implementing staff to focus on their intended beneficiaries. Feedback systems build on the rich heritage of PM&E and are compatible with logframes. They may help provide a manageable and effective approach to accountability that links the means and the ends of development interventions. Feedback systems are at an early stage of development. There is a lot to learn about how and where they work best.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceIDS bulletin;41,(2010) Pagination 36,44en_US
dc.subjectparticipatory monitoring and evaluation (pm&e)en_US
dc.subjectlogical framework approachen_US
dc.subjectlogframesen_US
dc.titleThree Approaches to Monitoring: Feedback Systems, Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation and Logical Frameworksen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.centerKeystone Accountibilityen_US
cg.contributor.centerItad Ltden_US
cg.contributor.funderGlobal Environment Facility - GEFen_US
cg.contributor.projectThe Middle East and North Africa Regional Program for Promoting Integrated Sustainable Land Development (MENARID)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contactchris.barnett@itad.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00180.xen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://menarid.icarda.org/Pages/Welcome%20Page.aspxen_US
mel.impact-factor0.319en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV