Show simple item record

dc.creatorGuijt, Ireneen_US
dc.identifier.citationIrene Guijt. (30/11/1999). A. Socio-economic methodologies for Natural Resources Research best practice guidelines: Participatory Monitoring and methodologies for natural resources research. United Kingdom: Natural Resources Institute.en_US
dc.description.abstractMonitoring and evaluation (M&E) have long been important for funding agencies to assess actual change against stated objectives, and thus to judge whether development assistance has been successful or not. This has usually involved external experts evaluating against indicators that have been determined externally or through rigid, imposed monitoring procedures. Yet changes are afoot and organizations are increasingly using M&E for internal learning and continual improvement to their work. They also increasingly realize that this needs to happen with a wide range of stakeholders, thus making M&E more participatory. Participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) involves the assessment of change through processes that involve many people or groups, each of whom is affecting or affected by the impacts being assessed. Negotiation leads to agreement on how progress should be measured and the findings acted upon. It is a challenging process for all concerned as different stakeholders must examine their assumptions about what constitutes progress – and together deal with the contradictions and conflicts that can emerge. For research managers of DFID-funded work, PM&E can stimulate a shift from assessing impacts based on DFID’s perceptions of benefits to include the perceptions of the target population. PM&E can, therefore, provide more comprehensive information on efficiency, relevance, sustainability, impact and effectiveness of work in progress. By learning from mistakes en route, it can lead to timely corrective action. By highlighting the successes of people’s efforts, it can increase motivation. The systematic and continual exchange of information can also strengthen working relationships. As the effectiveness of PM&E is based on sharing information, it requires careful identification of those who should share information and what information is worthwhile sharing.en_US
dc.publisherNatural Resources Instituteen_US
dc.titleA. Socio-economic methodologies for Natural Resources Research best practice guidelines: Participatory Monitoring and methodologies for natural resources researchen_US
cg.subject.agrovocnatural resourcesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmonitoring and evaluationen_US
cg.contributor.centerLearning by Designen_US
cg.contributor.funderGlobal Environment Facility - GEFen_US
cg.contributor.projectThe Middle East and North Africa Regional Program for Promoting Integrated Sustainable Land Development (MENARID)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
cg.isbn0 85954 496 – 6en_US

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV