Show simple item record

dc.contributorBadstue, Lone Bechen_US
dc.contributorCamfield, Lauraen_US
dc.contributorFeldman, Shelleyen_US
dc.contributorPrain, Gordonen_US
dc.contributorKantor, Paulaen_US
dc.creatorPetesch, Pattien_US
dc.date2018-09-15en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-08T16:29:54Z
dc.date.available2019-04-08T16:29:54Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/9e9471c62e6bb3688cb8e7314143d758en_US
dc.identifier.citationPatti Petesch, Lone Bech Badstue, Laura Camfield, Shelley Feldman, Gordon Prain, Paula Kantor. (15/9/2018). Qualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: The GENNOVATE field methodology. Journal of Gender Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), 3 (1), pp. 28-53.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9773
dc.description.abstractWe present a field-tested “medium-n” qualitative comparative methodology, which enhances understanding of the strong and fluid influence of gender norms on processes of local agricultural innovation in the Global South. The GENNOVATE approach (“Enabling Gender Equality in Agricultural and Environmental Innovation”) weaves together three broad methodological challenges—context, comparison, and collaboration—and highlights how addressing the social context of innovation contributes to applied research. We discuss GENNOVATE’s analytic approach, sampling framework, data collection, and analysis procedures, and reflect critically on the research strategies adopted to document and learn from the perspectives and experiences of over 7,000 women and men in 137 villages across 26 low- and middle-income countries.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherThe Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessmenten_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Gender Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender);3,(2018) Pagination 28,53en_US
dc.subjectgender normsen_US
dc.subjectqualitative comparative researchen_US
dc.titleQualitative, comparative, and collaborative research at large scale: The GENNOVATE field methodologyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocempowermenten_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of East Anglia - UEA UKen_US
cg.contributor.centerCornell University - CORNELLen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Potato Center - CIPen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.projectCRP WHEAT Phase IIen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.contactL.Badstue@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.19268/JGAFS.312018.2en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV