Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: recent experiences with agricultural research and development

cg.contactd.horton@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Service for National Agricultural Research** - ISNARen_US
cg.contributor.centerConcordia Universityen_US
cg.contributor.funderGlobal Environment Facility - GEFen_US
cg.contributor.projectThe Middle East and North Africa Regional Program for Promoting Integrated Sustainable Land Development (MENARID)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionGlobalen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00123-9en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0308-521Xen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalAgricultural Systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocimpact assessmenten_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultural researchen_US
cg.volume78en_US
dc.contributorMackay, Ronalden_US
dc.creatorHorton, Douglasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T00:33:40Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T00:33:40Z
dc.description.abstractNational agricultural research organizations as well as centres affiliated with the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) are under strong pressure to enhance their contributions to poverty alleviation, food security and protection of the environment and to demonstrate the results of their work. The dynamic world environment demands continuous changes in the ways in which research organizations operate and relate to other actors in agricultural innovation systems. To date, agricultural research evaluation has been dominated by economic impact assessment frameworks and methods. Designed as research studies, impact assessments have often served accountability and public awareness purposes. However, they have been of less use to further the understanding of how policies, programs and technologies may or may not contribute to agricultural innovation. There is an increasing awareness that appropriately designed and executed evaluations—going beyond traditional economic impact assessment—can contribute substantially to institutional learning and performance improvement. This article outlines the links between evaluation, learning and institutional change, and in doing so briefly summarizes the papers in this special issue of Agricultural Systems.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationDouglas Horton, Ronald Mackay. (30/11/2003). Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: recent experiences with agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), pp. 127-142.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9495
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Systems;78,(2003) Pagination 127,142en_US
dc.subjectevaluation; learningen_US
dc.titleUsing evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: recent experiences with agricultural research and developmenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2003-09-30en_US
dcterms.extent127-142en_US
dcterms.issued2003-11-30en_US
mel.impact-factor3.004en_US
mel.project.openhttps://menarid.icarda.org/Pages/Welcome%20Page.aspxen_US

Files