Show simple item record

dc.contributorDarej, Cyrineen_US
dc.contributorBen Youssef, Salahen_US
dc.contributorChakroun, Mohameden_US
dc.contributorAbidi, Sourouren_US
dc.contributorBen Salem, Hichemen_US
dc.contributorMoujahed, Nizaren_US
dc.creatorGuesmi, Hajeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-04T21:27:35Z
dc.date.available2021-01-04T21:27:35Z
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationHajer Guesmi, Cyrine Darej, Salah Ben Youssef, Mohamed Chakroun, Sourour Abidi, Hichem Ben Salem, Nizar Moujahed. (30/6/2020). Wheat Stubble from Conventional or Conservation Agriculture Grazed by Ewes: Biomass Dynamics and Animal Performances. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 20 (2), pp. 187-200.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12292
dc.description.abstractThis experiment aimed to determine the effect of stocking rates and cropping systems (conventional agriculture; Conv A vs. conservation agriculture; Cons A) on biomass dynamics and animal performance parameters of ewes grazing on wheat stubble. Forty Barbarine ewes were divided into eight homogeneous groups and allotted equally to the two cropping systems. Two stocking rates of 15 (SR15) and 30 (SR30) ewes/ha were tested for each cropping system, during a period of 60 d. Stubble biomass and BW variations were monitored at periodic intervals. Blood was sampled thrice during the study period at 15 d intervals. Results showed that the stubble biomass exhibited a gradual decrease (P<0.0001) with the progression of the duration by margins of -85.6 and -81.3% on DM basis, respectively, in Conv A and Cons A, as compared to initial biomass. Further, the biomass was also significantly (P=0.03) affected by the cropping system with a higher value in Conv A than Cons A. The variations in biomass chemical composition showed that the CP content decreased (P<0.0001) with advancing of period, while that of ADF increased (P<0.0001). Additionally, there was a significant effect (P=0.0002) of cropping mode evident in the nutritional composition. Overall, the animals maintained their average BW between the beginning (47.16 kg) and the end (47.36 kg) of the experiment. The blood parameters measured were well within the ranges of normal values for sheep. The stocking rates did not show impact on any of the parameters, with the values being generally similar between stocking rates and cropping systems. It is concluded that while the stocking rate had no effect on the measured variables, conservation agricultural system seemed to keep a higher proportion of residual biomass at the end of the experiment as compared to conventional agriculture.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherAnimal Nutrition Associationen_US
dc.sourceAnimal Nutrition and Feed Technology;20,(2020) Pagination 187-200en_US
dc.subjectconventional agricultureen_US
dc.subjectstocking ratesen_US
dc.subjectwheat stubblesen_US
dc.titleWheat Stubble from Conventional or Conservation Agriculture Grazed by Ewes: Biomass Dynamics and Animal Performancesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2020-06-30en_US
dcterms.extent187-200en_US
cg.subject.agrovocconservation agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocewesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocDurum Wheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocSheepen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia - INRATen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe Institution of Research and Higher Agricultural Education - IRESAen_US
cg.contributor.centerNational Agronomic Institute of Tunisia - INATen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Fund for Agricultural Development - IFADen_US
cg.contributor.projectUse of Conservation Agriculture in Crop-Livestock Systems (CLCA) in the Drylands for Enhanced Water Use and Soil Fertility in NEN and LAC Countriesen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryTNen_US
cg.contactGuessmihajer55@gmail.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2020.00018.9en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/clca2en_US
mel.impact-factor0.146en_US
mel.funder.grant#International Fund for Agricultural Development - IFAD :2000001630en_US
cg.issn0972-2963en_US
cg.isbn0974-181Xen_US
cg.journalAnimal Nutrition and Feed Technologyen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.volume20en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV