Show simple item record

dc.contributorHossain, M.en_US
dc.contributorKashem, M.en_US
dc.contributorAgrawal, Shiv Kumaren_US
dc.contributorRafii, M.en_US
dc.contributorLatif, M.en_US
dc.creatorRashid, M.H.en_US
dc.date2014-03-02en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-24T00:55:20Z
dc.date.available2017-07-24T00:55:20Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/639246/en_US
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/261605411_Efficacy_of_Combined_Formulations_of_Fungicides_with_Different_Modes_of_Action_in_Controlling_Botrytis_Gray_Mold_Disease_in_Chickpeaen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/download/hash/OncNJrF5en_US
dc.identifier.citationM. H. Rashid, M. Hossain, M. Kashem, Shiv Kumar Agrawal, M. Rafii, M. Latif. (2/3/2014). Efficacy of Combined Formulations of Fungicides with Different Modes of Action in Controlling Botrytis Gray Mold Disease in Chickpea. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, pp. 1-6.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7288
dc.description.abstractBotrytis gray mold (BGM) caused by Botrytis cinerea Pers. Ex. Fr. is an extremely devastating disease of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and has a regional as well as an international perspective. Unfortunately, nonchemical methods for its control are weak and ineffective. In order to identify an effective control measure, six fungicides with differentmodes of action were evaluated on a BGM susceptible chickpea variety BARIchhola-1 at a high BGMincidence location (Madaripur) in Bangladesh for three years (2008, 2009, and 2010). Among the six fungicides tested, one was protectant [Vondozeb 42SC, a.i. mancozeb (0.2%)], two systemic [Bavistin 50WP, a.i. carbendazim (0.2%), and Protaf 250EC, propiconazole (0.05%)], and three combination formulations [AcrobatMZ690, dimethomorph 9% + mancozeb 60%, (0.2%); Secure 600WG, phenomadone +mancozeb (0.2%); and Companion, mancozeb 63% + carbendazim 12% (0.2%)]. The results showed superiority of combination formulations involving both protectant and systemic fungicides over the sole application of either fungicide separately. Among the combination fungicides, Companion was most effective, resulting in the lowest disease severity (3.33 score on 1–9 scale) and the highest increase (38%) of grain yield in chickpea. Therefore, this product could be preferred over the sole application of either solo protectant or systemic fungicides to reduce yield losses and avoid fungicide resistance.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceThe Scientific World Journal;2014 ,(2014) Pagination 1,6en_US
dc.subjectbotrytis gray molden_US
dc.subjectfungicideen_US
dc.subjectChickpeaen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Combined Formulations of Fungicides with Different Modes of Action in Controlling Botrytis Gray Mold Disease in Chickpeaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.creator.idAgrawal, Shiv Kumar: 0000-0001-8407-3562en_US
cg.creator.ID-typeORCIDen_US
cg.subject.agrovocagricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.contributor.centerBangladesh Agricultural Research Institute - BARI, Bangladeshen_US
cg.contributor.centerBangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture - BINAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversiti Putra Malaysia - UPMen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryBDen_US
cg.contactalatif1965@yahoo.comen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/639246en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
mel.impact-factor0en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Disclaimer:
MELSpace content providers and partners accept no liability to any consequence resulting from use of the content or data made available in this repository. Users of this content assume full responsibility for compliance with all relevant national or international regulations and legislation.
Theme by 
Atmire NV